Technology Feature - Conventional versus dual-sensor streamer data de-ghosting: A case study from a Haltenbanken survey - Hocine Tabti, Anthony Day, Terry Schade, Marina Lesnes and Torben Høy discuss findings from a survey offshore Norway by Petroleum Geo-Services in which conventional and dual-sensor streamer data de-ghosting performance could be directly compared.

Tabti, Hocine | Online Contents | 2009

Conventional versus dual-sensor streamer data de-ghosting: a case study from a Haltenbanken survey

Tabti, H. / Day, A. / Schade, T. et al. | British Library Online Contents | 2009

conventional baseline survey Time-lapse acquisition with a dual-sensor streamer over a Anthony Day, Martin Widmaier, Torben Høy and Berit Osnes, PGS, describe an experiment to validate the use of a dual-sensor streamer for time-lapse acquisition.

Online Contents | 2010

Time-lapse acquisition with a dual-sensor streamer over a conventional baseline survey

Day, A. / Widmaier, M. / Hoy, T. et al. | British Library Online Contents | 2010

Comparison of Q estimation using data from conventional hydrophone and dual-sensor streamer acquisitions Matt Deighton and Alan Vigner, Petroleum Geo-Services, discuss the estimation of Q using different spectral ratio methodologies with data from different towed streamer technologies, and show that the increased useable bandwidth from dual-sensor streamers and careful choice of reference wavelet measurably improve the result

British Library Online Contents | 2010