Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Comparison of Oxidants Used in Advanced Oxidation for Potable Reuse: Non-Target Analysis and Bioassays
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1270-0904
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8730-7851
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-1407
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6947-7611
Free chlorine (HOCl) and monochloramine (NH2Cl) are less-used oxidants than hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in ultraviolet advanced oxidation processes (UV-AOPs) but have garnered interest from the water reuse industry and scientific community because they can be more cost-effective than H2O2 and provide a protective disinfectant residual. The destruction of organic compounds, creation of UV-AOP byproducts, and change in toxicity during UV-AOP with H2O2, HOCl, NH2Cl, or ambient residual chloramine were evaluated in recycled wastewater by suspect and non-target screening as well as bioanalytical tests (bioassays). Ten compounds were identified in reverse osmosis (RO) permeate via suspect screening with removal near 100% by UV/H2O2 and UV/HOCl, greater than decomposition by UV/NH2Cl and UV/ambient (∼60%), based on suspect screening mass spectrometry peak area. Non-target analysis based on organic features in mixed-mode cation exchange cartridge extracts indicated that UV/H2O2 destroyed a similar or slightly greater fraction of organic compounds, formed fewer transformation products, and reduced the summed peak area of non-target features to the greatest extent. Fewer chlorinated byproducts were produced from the RO permeate treated by UV/H2O2 than exposure to the chlorine-containing oxidants. Addition of NH2Cl to RO permeate resulted in a slight increase in the bioassay oxidative stress response but dropped below the response limit for all samples after UV-AOP for all oxidants.
H2O2 was the most suitable oxidant for ultraviolet advanced oxidation in water reuse, compared to HOCl and NH2Cl, based on destruction of organic compounds, reduced transformation products, and lack of oxidative stress induction.
Comparison of Oxidants Used in Advanced Oxidation for Potable Reuse: Non-Target Analysis and Bioassays
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1270-0904
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8730-7851
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-1407
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6947-7611
Free chlorine (HOCl) and monochloramine (NH2Cl) are less-used oxidants than hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in ultraviolet advanced oxidation processes (UV-AOPs) but have garnered interest from the water reuse industry and scientific community because they can be more cost-effective than H2O2 and provide a protective disinfectant residual. The destruction of organic compounds, creation of UV-AOP byproducts, and change in toxicity during UV-AOP with H2O2, HOCl, NH2Cl, or ambient residual chloramine were evaluated in recycled wastewater by suspect and non-target screening as well as bioanalytical tests (bioassays). Ten compounds were identified in reverse osmosis (RO) permeate via suspect screening with removal near 100% by UV/H2O2 and UV/HOCl, greater than decomposition by UV/NH2Cl and UV/ambient (∼60%), based on suspect screening mass spectrometry peak area. Non-target analysis based on organic features in mixed-mode cation exchange cartridge extracts indicated that UV/H2O2 destroyed a similar or slightly greater fraction of organic compounds, formed fewer transformation products, and reduced the summed peak area of non-target features to the greatest extent. Fewer chlorinated byproducts were produced from the RO permeate treated by UV/H2O2 than exposure to the chlorine-containing oxidants. Addition of NH2Cl to RO permeate resulted in a slight increase in the bioassay oxidative stress response but dropped below the response limit for all samples after UV-AOP for all oxidants.
H2O2 was the most suitable oxidant for ultraviolet advanced oxidation in water reuse, compared to HOCl and NH2Cl, based on destruction of organic compounds, reduced transformation products, and lack of oxidative stress induction.
Comparison of Oxidants Used in Advanced Oxidation for Potable Reuse: Non-Target Analysis and Bioassays
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1270-0904
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8730-7851
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2191-1407
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6947-7611
Free chlorine (HOCl) and monochloramine (NH2Cl) are less-used oxidants than hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) in ultraviolet advanced oxidation processes (UV-AOPs) but have garnered interest from the water reuse industry and scientific community because they can be more cost-effective than H2O2 and provide a protective disinfectant residual. The destruction of organic compounds, creation of UV-AOP byproducts, and change in toxicity during UV-AOP with H2O2, HOCl, NH2Cl, or ambient residual chloramine were evaluated in recycled wastewater by suspect and non-target screening as well as bioanalytical tests (bioassays). Ten compounds were identified in reverse osmosis (RO) permeate via suspect screening with removal near 100% by UV/H2O2 and UV/HOCl, greater than decomposition by UV/NH2Cl and UV/ambient (∼60%), based on suspect screening mass spectrometry peak area. Non-target analysis based on organic features in mixed-mode cation exchange cartridge extracts indicated that UV/H2O2 destroyed a similar or slightly greater fraction of organic compounds, formed fewer transformation products, and reduced the summed peak area of non-target features to the greatest extent. Fewer chlorinated byproducts were produced from the RO permeate treated by UV/H2O2 than exposure to the chlorine-containing oxidants. Addition of NH2Cl to RO permeate resulted in a slight increase in the bioassay oxidative stress response but dropped below the response limit for all samples after UV-AOP for all oxidants.
H2O2 was the most suitable oxidant for ultraviolet advanced oxidation in water reuse, compared to HOCl and NH2Cl, based on destruction of organic compounds, reduced transformation products, and lack of oxidative stress induction.
Comparison of Oxidants Used in Advanced Oxidation for Potable Reuse: Non-Target Analysis and Bioassays
Song, Mingrui (Autor:in) / McKenna, Elizabeth (Autor:in) / Ferrer, Imma (Autor:in) / Thurman, E. Michael (Autor:in) / Taylor-Edmonds, Liz (Autor:in) / Hofmann, Ronald (Autor:in) / Ishida, Kenneth P. (Autor:in) / Roback, Shannon L. (Autor:in) / Plumlee, Megan H. (Autor:in) / Hanigan, David (Autor:in)
ACS ES&T Water ; 3 ; 690-700
10.03.2023
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
PFAS Complicate Potable Reuse and Advanced Treatment
| Wiley | 2022
Chlorine and chlorine dioxide: Pre-oxidants used as algocide in potable water plants
| Online Contents | 1996
Advanced Research of Potable Reuse in Northern California
| TIBKAT | 2018
| Wiley | 2022
| Wiley | 2023