Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Use of a 3D Structured-Light Scanner to Determine Volume, Surface Area, and Shape of Aggregates
The standard method of using a caliper to determine aggregate particle dimensions is not sufficient to describe the shape, texture, angularity, and volume of particles, and there is not a reference method to determine aggregate surface area. A three-dimensional (3D) structured-light scanner seems to be a viable and economical alternative with enough speed to obtain 3D data from hundreds of particles. This work used a 3D scanner to evaluate morphological properties of coarse aggregates and compared results with those from conventional techniques. Two types of aggregates (around 60 particles of each type) were scanned and manually measured by a single operator with a digital caliper using two different methodologies: (1) the minimum bounding box (MBB), and (2) a conventional standard test method (STD). The 3D structured-light scanner proved to be accurate for assessing the morphology, surface area, and volume of coarse aggregates, and with a processing rate of , it was faster than other techniques such as X-ray computed microtomography (micro-CT) or laser scanning. Compared with the manual method (caliper) or the most commonly used two-dimensional (2D) image analysis techniques, it also was more accurate. The MBB using a caliper overestimated volume by about 17% and underestimated surface area by 11%, which was estimated by assuming an ellipsoid with the dimensions obtained. The 2D circularity had a poor correlation with the 3D sphericity, especially for flat or elongated particles.
Use of a 3D Structured-Light Scanner to Determine Volume, Surface Area, and Shape of Aggregates
The standard method of using a caliper to determine aggregate particle dimensions is not sufficient to describe the shape, texture, angularity, and volume of particles, and there is not a reference method to determine aggregate surface area. A three-dimensional (3D) structured-light scanner seems to be a viable and economical alternative with enough speed to obtain 3D data from hundreds of particles. This work used a 3D scanner to evaluate morphological properties of coarse aggregates and compared results with those from conventional techniques. Two types of aggregates (around 60 particles of each type) were scanned and manually measured by a single operator with a digital caliper using two different methodologies: (1) the minimum bounding box (MBB), and (2) a conventional standard test method (STD). The 3D structured-light scanner proved to be accurate for assessing the morphology, surface area, and volume of coarse aggregates, and with a processing rate of , it was faster than other techniques such as X-ray computed microtomography (micro-CT) or laser scanning. Compared with the manual method (caliper) or the most commonly used two-dimensional (2D) image analysis techniques, it also was more accurate. The MBB using a caliper overestimated volume by about 17% and underestimated surface area by 11%, which was estimated by assuming an ellipsoid with the dimensions obtained. The 2D circularity had a poor correlation with the 3D sphericity, especially for flat or elongated particles.
Use of a 3D Structured-Light Scanner to Determine Volume, Surface Area, and Shape of Aggregates
Loz, Paulo H. F. (Autor:in) / Angulo, Sérgio C. (Autor:in) / Rebmann, Markus S. (Autor:in) / Tutumluer, Erol (Autor:in)
12.07.2021
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Analytical and Laser Scanning Techniques to Determine Shape Properties of Aggregates
British Library Online Contents | 2013
|Tests determine alkali-reactive aggregates
Engineering Index Backfile | 1944
|FringeMatchNet: effective stereo matching onboard of mobile structured light 3D scanner
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2019
|Light-weight aggregates available over wide area
Engineering Index Backfile | 1932
First Utilization of Energy Transfer in Structured Light Projection - Infrared 3D Scanner
British Library Online Contents | 2014
|