Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Cost Comparison of Breakwater Types
A cost comparison have been made between various types of breakwaters for a fictitious situation in waterdepths to a local maximum of -15 m and an adopted sea climate. The comparison is based on optimal total project costs, being the sum of costs of construction and capitalized damage during the service period. For these selected conditions the caisson breakwater and the rubble mound type provided with a single concrete armour layer appear most attractive. Composite type of breakwaters seem advantageousfor water depths approximately below -20 m.
Cost Comparison of Breakwater Types
A cost comparison have been made between various types of breakwaters for a fictitious situation in waterdepths to a local maximum of -15 m and an adopted sea climate. The comparison is based on optimal total project costs, being the sum of costs of construction and capitalized damage during the service period. For these selected conditions the caisson breakwater and the rubble mound type provided with a single concrete armour layer appear most attractive. Composite type of breakwaters seem advantageousfor water depths approximately below -20 m.
Cost Comparison of Breakwater Types
Tutuarima, W.H. (Autor:in) / d’Angremond, K. (Autor:in)
26th International Conference on Coastal Engineering
Coastal Engineering 1998 ; 1934-1944
26.04.1999
Aufsatz (Konferenz)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Cost Comparison of Breakwater Types
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1999
|Engineering Index Backfile | 1966
|Floating Breakwater Performance Comparison
NTIS | 1979
|Cost-Effectiveness of D-Armor Breakwater
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995
|Optimal cost evaluation in breakwater design
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2009
|