Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Comparison of Fine Particle Clogging in Soil and Geotextile Filters
This paper addresses the differences in the extent of clogging associated with fine particle transport in soils and geotextiles. A common experimental set-up was designed for soil and geotextile filtration. Tests were conducted using a nonwoven, needle-punched geotextile filter sample permeated with fine particle suspensions under constant flow rate. The results were compared with those from similar experiments using soil filters. Geotextile clogging was modeled using an extension of a soil-clogging model. The experimental results assisted in the evaluation of the critical velocity of particle deposition in geotextiles. Comparisons were made between the soil and geotextile clogging models for a better understanding of the clogging mechanisms. It is estimated that the critical velocity for geotextiles is on the order of 10–3 cm/sec, considerably less than the corresponding value for filter soils (10–1 cm/sec). Comparison between soil and geotextile filters shows the geotextile provides a better filtration function without excessive clogging for the same types and sizes of particle concentrations. The modeling simulation showed that both particle numbers and sizes should be considered instead of mass-based concentrations alone in order to estimate the extent of physical clogging.
Comparison of Fine Particle Clogging in Soil and Geotextile Filters
This paper addresses the differences in the extent of clogging associated with fine particle transport in soils and geotextiles. A common experimental set-up was designed for soil and geotextile filtration. Tests were conducted using a nonwoven, needle-punched geotextile filter sample permeated with fine particle suspensions under constant flow rate. The results were compared with those from similar experiments using soil filters. Geotextile clogging was modeled using an extension of a soil-clogging model. The experimental results assisted in the evaluation of the critical velocity of particle deposition in geotextiles. Comparisons were made between the soil and geotextile clogging models for a better understanding of the clogging mechanisms. It is estimated that the critical velocity for geotextiles is on the order of 10–3 cm/sec, considerably less than the corresponding value for filter soils (10–1 cm/sec). Comparison between soil and geotextile filters shows the geotextile provides a better filtration function without excessive clogging for the same types and sizes of particle concentrations. The modeling simulation showed that both particle numbers and sizes should be considered instead of mass-based concentrations alone in order to estimate the extent of physical clogging.
Comparison of Fine Particle Clogging in Soil and Geotextile Filters
Xiao, Ming (Autor:in) / Reddi, Lakshmi N. (Autor:in)
Geo-Denver 2000 ; 2000 ; Denver, Colorado, United States
24.07.2000
Aufsatz (Konferenz)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Comparison of Fine Particle Clogging in Soil and Geotextile Filters
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2000
Biological Clogging of Geotextile Filters- A Five Year Study
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1999
Clogging and Piping Criteria for Geotextile Filters with Fly Ash
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996
An Experimental on Filtration and Clogging of Geotextile Filters around Drain Pipes in Fine Tailings
| Springer Verlag | 2024