Full-Scale Cyclic Testing of Low-Ductility Concentrically Braced Frames: Fid-Bau Portal

Full-Scale Cyclic Testing of Low-Ductility Concentrically Braced Frames

Bradley, Cameron R. / Fahnestock, Larry A. / Hines, Eric M. / Sizemore, Joshua G.

Two full-scale, two-story, low-ductility steel concentrically braced frame (CBF) systems were tested to evaluate failure mechanisms, postelastic frame behavior, reserve capacity, and overall collapse performance. These frames were designed for a moderate seismic region, where reserve capacity is emerging as a parameter that can be employed instead of primary system ductility to economically prevent seismic collapse. One test unit used a split-x bracing configuration and satisfied seismic detailing and proportioning requirements in the AISC Seismic Provisions for an ordinary concentrically braced frame (OCBF) with $R = 3.25$ . The other test unit used a chevron CBF configuration with $R = 3$ and included no seismic detailing. Each test unit was subjected to a quasistatic cyclic loading protocol and was cycled to total frame drifts in excess of 3.0%. The split-x OCBF exhibited ductile brace buckling behavior up to 1.5% total frame drift, but possessed little reserve capacity after two weld fractures. The $R = 3$ chevron CBF exhibited brittle brace buckling and subsequently developed several distinct reserve capacity mechanisms. These tests demonstrate overall hysteretic behaviors that are highly dependent on two underlying design parameters: system type and system configuration. OCBF brace local slenderness and connection capacity design requirements are effective for providing ductile brace-buckling behavior. The split-x configuration appears more vulnerable to developing multistory mechanisms that possess limited reserve capacity, but this can be improved with strategically placed, enhanced beam-column connections. The chevron configuration is more prone to single-story mechanisms that possess significant reserve capacity developed through beam and column flexure.