Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
The Costing of Measures for Natural Hazard Mitigation in Europe
The literature on the costing of mitigation measures for reducing impacts of natural hazards is rather fragmented. This paper provides a concise overview of the current state of knowledge in Europe on the costing of mitigation measures for the reduction of natural hazard risks (droughts, floods, storms and induced coastal hazards as well as alpine hazards) and identifies knowledge gaps and related research recommendations. Furthermore, it provides a taxonomy of related mitigation options, classifying them into nine categories: (1) management plans, land-use planning, and climate adaptation; (2) hazard modification; (3) infrastructure; (4) mitigation measures (stricto sensu); (5) communication in advance of events; (6) monitoring and early warning systems; (7) emergency response and evacuation; (8) financial incentives; and (9) risk transfer (including insurance). It is found that the costing of mitigation measures in European and in other countries has almost exclusively focused on estimating direct costs. A cost assessment framework that addresses a range of costs, possibly informed by multiple stakeholders, would provide more accurate estimates and could provide better guidance to decision makers.
The Costing of Measures for Natural Hazard Mitigation in Europe
The literature on the costing of mitigation measures for reducing impacts of natural hazards is rather fragmented. This paper provides a concise overview of the current state of knowledge in Europe on the costing of mitigation measures for the reduction of natural hazard risks (droughts, floods, storms and induced coastal hazards as well as alpine hazards) and identifies knowledge gaps and related research recommendations. Furthermore, it provides a taxonomy of related mitigation options, classifying them into nine categories: (1) management plans, land-use planning, and climate adaptation; (2) hazard modification; (3) infrastructure; (4) mitigation measures (stricto sensu); (5) communication in advance of events; (6) monitoring and early warning systems; (7) emergency response and evacuation; (8) financial incentives; and (9) risk transfer (including insurance). It is found that the costing of mitigation measures in European and in other countries has almost exclusively focused on estimating direct costs. A cost assessment framework that addresses a range of costs, possibly informed by multiple stakeholders, would provide more accurate estimates and could provide better guidance to decision makers.
The Costing of Measures for Natural Hazard Mitigation in Europe
Bouwer, Laurens M. (Autor:in) / Papyrakis, Elissaios (Autor:in) / Poussin, Jennifer (Autor:in) / Pfurtscheller, Clemens (Autor:in) / Thieken, Annegret H. (Autor:in)
23.11.2013
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997
|The use of retaining structures as natural terrain hazard mitigation measures
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1999
|Key Concepts in Implementing Hazard Mitigation Measures
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2008
|Key Concepts in Implementing Hazard Mitigation Measures
ASCE | 2008
|Hazard Mitigation Measures for a Cable-stayed Bridge
TIBKAT | 2021
|