Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
LRFD for Large-Diameter Bored Piles in Egypt
The main goal of this study is to implement the load and resistance factors design (LRFD) approach for large-diameter bored piles considering the use of various static analysis methods available in the AASHTO specifications and the Egyptian code of practice. Exclusively, reliability-based LRFD resistance factors were calibrated for the O'Neill and Reese, the ECDF, and the Brown et al. methods using a wide range of soil types-knowing that these design methods are used in the current AASHTO specifications, the 2001 Egyptian code, and the 2010 FHWA design manual for deep foundations, respectively. The analysis was based on a newly developed national electronic database that consists of information from more than 90 static load tests. From the main findings, the values of the resistance factors for the 2001 ECDF method ranged from 0.86 to 0.41. However, the 2010 FHWA method generally provided higher efficiency compared with the 2007 AASHTO method and the 2001 ECDF in sand, clay, and mixed soils.
LRFD for Large-Diameter Bored Piles in Egypt
The main goal of this study is to implement the load and resistance factors design (LRFD) approach for large-diameter bored piles considering the use of various static analysis methods available in the AASHTO specifications and the Egyptian code of practice. Exclusively, reliability-based LRFD resistance factors were calibrated for the O'Neill and Reese, the ECDF, and the Brown et al. methods using a wide range of soil types-knowing that these design methods are used in the current AASHTO specifications, the 2001 Egyptian code, and the 2010 FHWA design manual for deep foundations, respectively. The analysis was based on a newly developed national electronic database that consists of information from more than 90 static load tests. From the main findings, the values of the resistance factors for the 2001 ECDF method ranged from 0.86 to 0.41. However, the 2010 FHWA method generally provided higher efficiency compared with the 2007 AASHTO method and the 2001 ECDF in sand, clay, and mixed soils.
LRFD for Large-Diameter Bored Piles in Egypt
AbdelSalam, Sherif S. (Autor:in) / El-Naggar, Hayel M. (Autor:in)
Geo-Congress 2014 ; 2014 ; Atlanta, Georgia
Geo-Congress 2014 Technical Papers ; 900-910
24.02.2014
Aufsatz (Konferenz)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
LRFD for Large-Diameter Bored Piles in Egypt
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2014
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1961
Large diameter bored piles in foundations
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1965
Structural Integrity of Large Diameter Bored Piles
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997
Integrity Problem of Large-Diameter Bored Piles
| Online Contents | 2009