Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Risk Tolerance, Aversion, and Economics of Energy Utilities in Community Resilience to Wildfires
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2692-241X
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3692-7874
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9521-3173
Electric and gas investor-owned utilities operate in a regulated environment and are scrutinized by media and stakeholders for key strategic and operational decisions. Some decisions entail significant risk, requiring special attention to risk tolerances and attitudes including risk aversion. Utilities typically institute enterprise risk management programs to efficiently and effectively manage safety, reliability, and financial risks for their customers, employees, and communities in a changing climate with intensifying risks, such as wildfire. Consequences from such events could include human life and property losses, health effects, environmental damage, service loss, and other indirect financial and economic impacts. A spectrum of risk quantification and management methods are available for assessing these hazards. Varying risk tolerances and attitudes of stakeholders creates situations that are central to decision-making where the safety, service delivery reliability, rate affordability, and the financial wellbeing of entities come together and interact in a complex manner. This paper sets context, defines key terms, and develops an innovative approach for methodically reflecting risk tolerance and attitude with a focus on risk aversion in informing risk management decisions by offering flexibility to account for preferences by stakeholders in a structured manner. The concept of risk-aversion amplification factors is proposed to reflect attitudes and preferences of decision makers in typical economic models used in benefit-cost analysis. Such amplification factors can be calibrated by applicable markets, such as insurance and catastrophe bond markets and used to estimate certainty-equivalent valuations of risks, costs, and benefits. The proposed methods are illustrated in the context of wildfire risk management for communities and utilities using two examples from these domains for enhancing resilience.
Risk Tolerance, Aversion, and Economics of Energy Utilities in Community Resilience to Wildfires
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2692-241X
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3692-7874
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9521-3173
Electric and gas investor-owned utilities operate in a regulated environment and are scrutinized by media and stakeholders for key strategic and operational decisions. Some decisions entail significant risk, requiring special attention to risk tolerances and attitudes including risk aversion. Utilities typically institute enterprise risk management programs to efficiently and effectively manage safety, reliability, and financial risks for their customers, employees, and communities in a changing climate with intensifying risks, such as wildfire. Consequences from such events could include human life and property losses, health effects, environmental damage, service loss, and other indirect financial and economic impacts. A spectrum of risk quantification and management methods are available for assessing these hazards. Varying risk tolerances and attitudes of stakeholders creates situations that are central to decision-making where the safety, service delivery reliability, rate affordability, and the financial wellbeing of entities come together and interact in a complex manner. This paper sets context, defines key terms, and develops an innovative approach for methodically reflecting risk tolerance and attitude with a focus on risk aversion in informing risk management decisions by offering flexibility to account for preferences by stakeholders in a structured manner. The concept of risk-aversion amplification factors is proposed to reflect attitudes and preferences of decision makers in typical economic models used in benefit-cost analysis. Such amplification factors can be calibrated by applicable markets, such as insurance and catastrophe bond markets and used to estimate certainty-equivalent valuations of risks, costs, and benefits. The proposed methods are illustrated in the context of wildfire risk management for communities and utilities using two examples from these domains for enhancing resilience.
Risk Tolerance, Aversion, and Economics of Energy Utilities in Community Resilience to Wildfires
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2692-241X
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3692-7874
https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9521-3173
Electric and gas investor-owned utilities operate in a regulated environment and are scrutinized by media and stakeholders for key strategic and operational decisions. Some decisions entail significant risk, requiring special attention to risk tolerances and attitudes including risk aversion. Utilities typically institute enterprise risk management programs to efficiently and effectively manage safety, reliability, and financial risks for their customers, employees, and communities in a changing climate with intensifying risks, such as wildfire. Consequences from such events could include human life and property losses, health effects, environmental damage, service loss, and other indirect financial and economic impacts. A spectrum of risk quantification and management methods are available for assessing these hazards. Varying risk tolerances and attitudes of stakeholders creates situations that are central to decision-making where the safety, service delivery reliability, rate affordability, and the financial wellbeing of entities come together and interact in a complex manner. This paper sets context, defines key terms, and develops an innovative approach for methodically reflecting risk tolerance and attitude with a focus on risk aversion in informing risk management decisions by offering flexibility to account for preferences by stakeholders in a structured manner. The concept of risk-aversion amplification factors is proposed to reflect attitudes and preferences of decision makers in typical economic models used in benefit-cost analysis. Such amplification factors can be calibrated by applicable markets, such as insurance and catastrophe bond markets and used to estimate certainty-equivalent valuations of risks, costs, and benefits. The proposed methods are illustrated in the context of wildfire risk management for communities and utilities using two examples from these domains for enhancing resilience.
Risk Tolerance, Aversion, and Economics of Energy Utilities in Community Resilience to Wildfires
ASCE-ASME J. Risk Uncertainty Eng. Syst., Part A: Civ. Eng.
Ayyub, Bilal M. (Autor:in) / Sawaya, Ramsay (Autor:in) / Butry, David T. (Autor:in) / Helgeson, Jennifer (Autor:in) / Oum, Yumi (Autor:in) / Loh, Vincent (Autor:in)
01.06.2024
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Probabilistic risk assessment for wildfires
| Wiley | 2006
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995
Measuring Forest Resilience Against Wildfires and Climate Change: Methods and Technical Approaches
| Springer Verlag | 2024
Effective Resilience Assessment Methodology for Water Utilities (ERASMUS)
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2012