Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Carbon Footprint between Steel-Reinforced Concrete and UHPC Beams
Due to its superior mechanical and durability performance, ultrahigh performance concrete (UHPC) has gained increasing applications worldwide. While studies have suggested different strategies to design reinforced UHPC beams, their resulting structural behavior is not yet well understood, and their carbon footprint has not been given considerable attention. Based on nonlinear finite element simulations and cradle-to-gate life-cycle analyses, this study compares the performance of two steel-reinforced concrete beams to steel-reinforced UHPC (R/UHPC) beams with the same flexural load capacity but different design strategies. Results show that an R/UHPC beam of the same cross-section but lower reinforcing ratio of a conventional concrete beam could show 166% higher carbon emission and 64% less deformation capacity than a control steel-reinforced concrete beam. On the other hand, a well-designed R/UHPC beam can (1) maintain the carbon footprint; (2) reduce the section size and steel bar usage by 50% and 30%–53%, respectively; and (3) show equivalent or higher service-level stiffness and ultimate deformation capacity.
Carbon Footprint between Steel-Reinforced Concrete and UHPC Beams
Due to its superior mechanical and durability performance, ultrahigh performance concrete (UHPC) has gained increasing applications worldwide. While studies have suggested different strategies to design reinforced UHPC beams, their resulting structural behavior is not yet well understood, and their carbon footprint has not been given considerable attention. Based on nonlinear finite element simulations and cradle-to-gate life-cycle analyses, this study compares the performance of two steel-reinforced concrete beams to steel-reinforced UHPC (R/UHPC) beams with the same flexural load capacity but different design strategies. Results show that an R/UHPC beam of the same cross-section but lower reinforcing ratio of a conventional concrete beam could show 166% higher carbon emission and 64% less deformation capacity than a control steel-reinforced concrete beam. On the other hand, a well-designed R/UHPC beam can (1) maintain the carbon footprint; (2) reduce the section size and steel bar usage by 50% and 30%–53%, respectively; and (3) show equivalent or higher service-level stiffness and ultimate deformation capacity.
Carbon Footprint between Steel-Reinforced Concrete and UHPC Beams
J. Struct. Eng.
Shao, Yi (Autor:in) / Parks, Avery (Autor:in) / Ostertag, Claudia P. (Autor:in)
01.03.2023
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Analysis on Flexural Performance of Prestressed Steel-Reinforced UHPC Beams
DOAJ | 2024
|UHPC Flexural Response of Lightly Reinforced Ultra-High Performance Concrete Beams
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2010
|The Flexural Performance of BFRP-Reinforced UHPC Beams Compared to Steel and GFRP-Reinforced Beams
DOAJ | 2022
|British Library Conference Proceedings | 2010
|