Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Sources of Onboard Fumes and Smoke Reported by U.S. Airlines
This paper describes the relative frequency of reports of oil and hydraulic fluid fumes in the ventilation supply air (“fume events”) compared to other types of fumes and smoke reported by U.S. airlines over 10 years. The author reviewed and categorized 12,417 fume/smoke reports submitted to the aviation regulator to comply with the primary maintenance reporting regulation (14 CFR § 121.703) from 2002–2011. The most commonly documented category of onboard fumes/smoke was electrical (37%). Combining the categories of “bleed-sourced”, “oil”, and “hydraulic fluid” created the second most prevalent category (26%). The remaining sources of onboard fumes/smoke are also reported. To put the data in context, the fume event reporting regulations are described, along with examples of ways in which certain events are underreported. These data were reported by U.S. airlines, but aviation regulations are harmonized globally, so the data likely also reflect onboard sources of fumes and smoke reported in other countries with equivalent aviation systems. The data provide insight into the relative frequency of the types of reported fumes and smoke on aircraft, which should drive design, operational, and maintenance actions to mitigate onboard exposure. The data also provide insight into how to improve current fume event reporting rules. ; This is a journal publication originating from the International Aircraft Cabin Air Conference 2019 (Imperial College, London, 17/18 September 2019)
Sources of Onboard Fumes and Smoke Reported by U.S. Airlines
This paper describes the relative frequency of reports of oil and hydraulic fluid fumes in the ventilation supply air (“fume events”) compared to other types of fumes and smoke reported by U.S. airlines over 10 years. The author reviewed and categorized 12,417 fume/smoke reports submitted to the aviation regulator to comply with the primary maintenance reporting regulation (14 CFR § 121.703) from 2002–2011. The most commonly documented category of onboard fumes/smoke was electrical (37%). Combining the categories of “bleed-sourced”, “oil”, and “hydraulic fluid” created the second most prevalent category (26%). The remaining sources of onboard fumes/smoke are also reported. To put the data in context, the fume event reporting regulations are described, along with examples of ways in which certain events are underreported. These data were reported by U.S. airlines, but aviation regulations are harmonized globally, so the data likely also reflect onboard sources of fumes and smoke reported in other countries with equivalent aviation systems. The data provide insight into the relative frequency of the types of reported fumes and smoke on aircraft, which should drive design, operational, and maintenance actions to mitigate onboard exposure. The data also provide insight into how to improve current fume event reporting rules. ; This is a journal publication originating from the International Aircraft Cabin Air Conference 2019 (Imperial College, London, 17/18 September 2019)
Sources of Onboard Fumes and Smoke Reported by U.S. Airlines
Anderson, Judith (Autor:in)
22.04.2021
oai:zenodo.org:5809723
Aerospace, Special Issue Aircraft Design (SI-3/2021) 8(5, paper 122)
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
reporting , electrical , ACA2019-PUB , engine oil , fume event , aircraft , hydraulic fluid , ACA2019
DDC:
690
Devices signal fire, smoke, fumes
Tema Archiv | 1974
Electrical precipitation of fumes and smoke, and smoke monitors
Engineering Index Backfile | 1914
|Evaluation of Fires by Establishing the Characteristics of Smoke Fumes
British Library Online Contents | 1992
|Duct smoke detectors keep toxic fumes in check during emergencies
British Library Online Contents | 2013
The aerodynamics of smoke detection - validation of Eurotunnel's onboard smoke detection system
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2000
|