Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Conflict and dispute in construction
'Conflict' and 'dispute' are two distinct notions. The conceptual difference between the two is explored and further reviewed through the literature on conflict and dispute in the field of construction; a taxonomy for future study is also introduced. Conflict, it is proposed, exists wherever there is incompatibility of interest, and therefore is pandemic. Conflict can be managed, possibly to the extent of preventing a dispute resulting from the conflict. Dispute is associated with distinct justiciable issues. Disputes require resolution. This means that they can be managed: the process of dispute resolution lends itself to third party intervention. The construction industry and the chemical process industry in the UK are compared, through perceptions and experiences of conflict and disputes arising from their two sets of standard contract forms. The methodology is a review of published cases and a survey conducted among professionals with experience. The paucity of research in this field is discussed and the empirical work on the causes of conflict and dispute is reviewed. It is concluded that effective management of conflicts and disputes would be furthered by separating the two fields, and particularly by applying a more stringent structuring.
Conflict and dispute in construction
'Conflict' and 'dispute' are two distinct notions. The conceptual difference between the two is explored and further reviewed through the literature on conflict and dispute in the field of construction; a taxonomy for future study is also introduced. Conflict, it is proposed, exists wherever there is incompatibility of interest, and therefore is pandemic. Conflict can be managed, possibly to the extent of preventing a dispute resulting from the conflict. Dispute is associated with distinct justiciable issues. Disputes require resolution. This means that they can be managed: the process of dispute resolution lends itself to third party intervention. The construction industry and the chemical process industry in the UK are compared, through perceptions and experiences of conflict and disputes arising from their two sets of standard contract forms. The methodology is a review of published cases and a survey conducted among professionals with experience. The paucity of research in this field is discussed and the empirical work on the causes of conflict and dispute is reviewed. It is concluded that effective management of conflicts and disputes would be furthered by separating the two fields, and particularly by applying a more stringent structuring.
Conflict and dispute in construction
Fenn, Peter (Autor:in) / Lowe, David (Autor:in) / Speck, Christopher (Autor:in)
01.11.1997
Fenn , P , Lowe , D & Speck , C 1997 , ' Conflict and dispute in construction ' Construction Management and Economics , vol 15 , no. 6 , pp. 513-518 . DOI:10.1080/014461997372719
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Chemical industry , /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2200/2215 , Building and Construction , /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/1400/1404 , Taxonomy , Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering , Conflict , Dispute , Construction , Standard contracts , Management Information Systems , /dk/atira/pure/subjectarea/asjc/2200/2209
DDC:
690
Conflict and dispute in construction
British Library Online Contents | 1997
|Conflict and dispute in construction
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1997
|Conflict and dispute in construction
Online Contents | 1997
|Commercial Conflict Management and Dispute Resolution
Online Contents | 2012
|Commercial Conflict Management and Dispute Resolution
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2012
|