Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
What went right? A collaborative process to prepare a city forest management strategy
Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Funding Information: The authors wish to acknowledge the Strategic Research Council at the Academy of Finland for financial support (project no: 313013, 313014, and 313017). Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. ; We analyze a multi-stakeholder process that succeeded in creating a joint forest management strategy for the city of Jyväskylä, Finland. The analysis draws on the participants’ own account of the process, elicited via interviews and questionnaires. We attend to critical context and process factors to account for the success of the collaborative process and evaluate the effectiveness of the agreement in terms of ecological and social outcomes. The process created a practical agreement, which increased the share of protected forests and introduced new biodiversity protection measures for commercial and recreational forests. It also created innovative solutions, like the new concept of a nature value forest, which helped the parties to negotiate around their differences. However, disagreement over the impacts of forest management practices, especially continuous cover forestry, remained. The crucial contextual conditions contributing to the agreement were strong initiating leadership and political mandate, which motivated the participants to engage in collaborative dialogue and stick with the process. The key process factors were a third-party facilitation and joint fact-finding. Most importantly, the process was not constrained by a pre-defined agenda or assumptions related to the status quo, but the participants were granted considerable influence over decisions and outputs. ; Peer reviewed
What went right? A collaborative process to prepare a city forest management strategy
Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. Funding Information: The authors wish to acknowledge the Strategic Research Council at the Academy of Finland for financial support (project no: 313013, 313014, and 313017). Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. ; We analyze a multi-stakeholder process that succeeded in creating a joint forest management strategy for the city of Jyväskylä, Finland. The analysis draws on the participants’ own account of the process, elicited via interviews and questionnaires. We attend to critical context and process factors to account for the success of the collaborative process and evaluate the effectiveness of the agreement in terms of ecological and social outcomes. The process created a practical agreement, which increased the share of protected forests and introduced new biodiversity protection measures for commercial and recreational forests. It also created innovative solutions, like the new concept of a nature value forest, which helped the parties to negotiate around their differences. However, disagreement over the impacts of forest management practices, especially continuous cover forestry, remained. The crucial contextual conditions contributing to the agreement were strong initiating leadership and political mandate, which motivated the participants to engage in collaborative dialogue and stick with the process. The key process factors were a third-party facilitation and joint fact-finding. Most importantly, the process was not constrained by a pre-defined agenda or assumptions related to the status quo, but the participants were granted considerable influence over decisions and outputs. ; Peer reviewed
What went right? A collaborative process to prepare a city forest management strategy
Saarikoski, Heli (Autor:in) / Luoma, Emma (Autor:in) / Bor, Sanne (Autor:in) / Polsa, Pia (Autor:in) / Marketing, Helsinki
13.10.2023
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
SDG 15 - Life on Land , 520 Other social sciences , consensus-building , forest management , 411,2 Forestry , deliberation , conflict resolution , 0- Ingen affiliation med ett företag , 2023 , KOTA2023? , AoS: Responsible organising , Collaborative governance , PREM2023_12 , 1- Publicerad utomlands , 2 - Hybrid open access publication channel , SDG 13 - Climate Action , SDG 6 - Clean Water and Sanitation , 1 - Publication available open access by the publisher , http://hdl.handle.net/10138/566152 , stakeholder engagement , 1 - Self archived , AACSB year , 0- Ingen av författarna har en utländsk affiliation , PRJ , 1,5 , natural resource management
DDC:
710
Online Contents | 1996
|2001-A CFL Odyssey: What Went Right?
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
|City Design: What Went Wrong at Milton Keynes?
Online Contents | 2001
|City Design: What Went Wrong at Milton Keynes?
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2001
|Evacuation of the World Trade Center: What Went Right
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2003
|