Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Non‐destructive evaluation of in‐place rehabilitated concrete pavements
Several in‐place rehabilitation techniques have been used before placing an Asphalt Concrete (AC) overlay on Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavements in attempts to minimize reflection cracking. Among these techniques, “rubblization” of PCC has been recognized to be the most utilized procedure for the mitigation of reflection cracking in US. This paper presents the practices on the use of rubblization in US and discusses the performance of this technique based on field evaluation. The specifications for the rubblization procedure used by state Department of Transportation (DOT) in US were reviewed. To evaluate the performance of rubblization technique, the structural and the surface conditions of AC overlaid pavements with rubblized PCC layer are compared to those with virgin PCC layer. A series of field experiment tests were carried out on six representative AC overlaid pavements with both rubblized PCC and virgin PCC in Iowa during 2007. The field experiment tests include the Nondestructive (NDT) and destructive tests, and the distress survey. Deflection Basin Parameters (DBPs) were derived from NDT test results to characterize the structural condition of pavements. The results indicate that the rubblized PCC layer has strength comparable to that of virgin PCC layer and has better performance under that structural condition. First Published Online: 10 Feb 2011
Non‐destructive evaluation of in‐place rehabilitated concrete pavements
Several in‐place rehabilitation techniques have been used before placing an Asphalt Concrete (AC) overlay on Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) pavements in attempts to minimize reflection cracking. Among these techniques, “rubblization” of PCC has been recognized to be the most utilized procedure for the mitigation of reflection cracking in US. This paper presents the practices on the use of rubblization in US and discusses the performance of this technique based on field evaluation. The specifications for the rubblization procedure used by state Department of Transportation (DOT) in US were reviewed. To evaluate the performance of rubblization technique, the structural and the surface conditions of AC overlaid pavements with rubblized PCC layer are compared to those with virgin PCC layer. A series of field experiment tests were carried out on six representative AC overlaid pavements with both rubblized PCC and virgin PCC in Iowa during 2007. The field experiment tests include the Nondestructive (NDT) and destructive tests, and the distress survey. Deflection Basin Parameters (DBPs) were derived from NDT test results to characterize the structural condition of pavements. The results indicate that the rubblized PCC layer has strength comparable to that of virgin PCC layer and has better performance under that structural condition. First Published Online: 10 Feb 2011
Non‐destructive evaluation of in‐place rehabilitated concrete pavements
Gopalakrishnan, Kasthurirangan (Autor:in) / Kim, Sunghwan (Autor:in) / Ceylan, Halil (Autor:in)
31.12.2010
doi:10.3846/jcem.2010.61
Journal of Civil Engineering and Management; Vol 16 No 4 (2010); 552-560 ; 1822-3605 ; 1392-3730
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
DDC:
690
Non‐destructive evaluation of in‐place rehabilitated concrete pavements
DOAJ | 2010
|Non‐destructive evaluation of in‐place rehabilitated concrete pavements
BASE | 2010
|Adhesion Testing on Rehabilitated Concrete Pavements
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2006
|Causes of Longitudinal Cracks on Newly Rehabilitated Jointed Concrete Pavements
British Library Online Contents | 2012
|Causes of Longitudinal Cracks on Newly Rehabilitated Jointed Concrete Pavements
Online Contents | 2012
|