Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Meaning in Architecture, now. A debate
More than fifty years have passed since the publication of "Meaning in Architecture", yet the debate on the issue of meaning in architecture continues to evolve and engage the architectural community, even if in subtler, less apparent ways than in the past. Five questions. Five women. Five places. Five sensitivities. Five visions of architecture. This debate looks at the most critical emerging architectural trends, using the peculiar multivalence of meaning to discuss its architectural nature in a rich discussion involving various architects and scholars in five parallel interviews. Delving into the independence (or not) of architecture, the relevance (or not) of the process, the confrontation between shapes and uses, the economic dimension of design and the rise of AI, the debate aims to give a multifaceted interpretation of meanings, or rather, to explore how architectural design is evolving, and why. The answers were blind and even unknown to each other, so to better highlight the different approaches and ideas: to the reader the possibility of side-reading them and adhering to one, all or even none, postulating a distinct personal position.
Meaning in Architecture, now. A debate
More than fifty years have passed since the publication of "Meaning in Architecture", yet the debate on the issue of meaning in architecture continues to evolve and engage the architectural community, even if in subtler, less apparent ways than in the past. Five questions. Five women. Five places. Five sensitivities. Five visions of architecture. This debate looks at the most critical emerging architectural trends, using the peculiar multivalence of meaning to discuss its architectural nature in a rich discussion involving various architects and scholars in five parallel interviews. Delving into the independence (or not) of architecture, the relevance (or not) of the process, the confrontation between shapes and uses, the economic dimension of design and the rise of AI, the debate aims to give a multifaceted interpretation of meanings, or rather, to explore how architectural design is evolving, and why. The answers were blind and even unknown to each other, so to better highlight the different approaches and ideas: to the reader the possibility of side-reading them and adhering to one, all or even none, postulating a distinct personal position.
Meaning in Architecture, now. A debate
Carlo Deregibus (Autor:in) / Dora Epstein Jones (Autor:in) / Eleanor Jolliffe (Autor:in) / Georgia Lindsay (Autor:in) / Akiko Okabe (Autor:in) / Philippa Nyakato Tumubweinee (Autor:in) / Deregibus, Carlo / Epstein Jones, Dora / Jolliffe, Eleanor / Lindsay, Georgia
01.01.2024
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Meaning in Architecture, now. A Debate ; Meaning in Architecture, now. A debate
| BASE | 2024
Well-meaning: V&A's building debate
British Library Online Contents | 2003
REVIEW - Well-meaning: V& A's building debate
Online Contents | 2003
| UB Braunschweig | 1970
| TIBKAT | 1970