Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Holistically assessing collaborative culture in the AEC industry
The insufficient understanding and literature on people collaborating in the Architectural-Engineering-Construction (AEC) industry has prompted researchers to investigate this by conducting project-to-project comparisons. A mixed method-based comparison of two construction projects’ design teams was made in order to present factors to be considered in fostering a positive collaborative culture. Client knowledge and involvement, existing relationships between teams, stronger informal collaboration, a decentralised leadership style and the adequate monetary motivation to a firm were found to be most critical. The study also assessed whether the use of holistic analysis methods can quantitatively show the differences between the projects; in particular, which project had a more positive collaborative culture. The perception based method used correlated the variance of perception of the teamwork environment and systemic risk to the projects with a more positive collaborative culture; 80% of constructs (some postulated attribute of people assumed, to reflect in test performance) supported the qualitative data. Additionally, assessments of the personalities of respondents from the project with a more collaborative culture also showed higher collective agreeableness. Findings suggest that projects with more changes, more assumptions made and uncertainty in requirements affect the collaborative culture negatively. ; publishedVersion
Holistically assessing collaborative culture in the AEC industry
The insufficient understanding and literature on people collaborating in the Architectural-Engineering-Construction (AEC) industry has prompted researchers to investigate this by conducting project-to-project comparisons. A mixed method-based comparison of two construction projects’ design teams was made in order to present factors to be considered in fostering a positive collaborative culture. Client knowledge and involvement, existing relationships between teams, stronger informal collaboration, a decentralised leadership style and the adequate monetary motivation to a firm were found to be most critical. The study also assessed whether the use of holistic analysis methods can quantitatively show the differences between the projects; in particular, which project had a more positive collaborative culture. The perception based method used correlated the variance of perception of the teamwork environment and systemic risk to the projects with a more positive collaborative culture; 80% of constructs (some postulated attribute of people assumed, to reflect in test performance) supported the qualitative data. Additionally, assessments of the personalities of respondents from the project with a more collaborative culture also showed higher collective agreeableness. Findings suggest that projects with more changes, more assumptions made and uncertainty in requirements affect the collaborative culture negatively. ; publishedVersion
Holistically assessing collaborative culture in the AEC industry
Sujan, Sujesh Francis (Autor:in) / Jones, Steve Wynford (Autor:in) / Kiviniemi, Arto (Autor:in) / Wheatcroft, Jacqueline Mary (Autor:in) / Mwiya, Bwalimu (Autor:in)
01.01.2020
cristin:1888545
272-286 ; 25 ; Journal of Information Technology in Construction (ITcon)
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
DDC:
690
Green Space - Sustainability -- Thinking holistically
Online Contents | 2008
Building holistically: Ecology and development harmonize in architect
British Library Online Contents | 1997
|METHODS OF HOLISTICALLY DIFFUSING CARBON DIOXIDE WITHIN A CONCRETE MIXTURE
Europäisches Patentamt | 2022
|Sustainability: viewed both holistically and as a construction application
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1994
|WESTE methodology for holistically evaluation of the waste management chain
BASE | 2017
|