Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Innovations in spatial planning as a social process – phases, actors, conflicts
The aim of this paper is to understand the social process of the emergence and institutionalization of innovations in spatial planning (which we describe as ‘social innovations’). The paper is based on a recently finished empirical and comparative study conducted in four distinct areas of spatial planning in Germany: urban design, neighbourhood development, urban regeneration and regional planning. The empirical cases selected in these areas encompass different topics, historical periods, degrees of maturity and spatial scales of innovation. As a temporal structure of the innovation processes in the different cases we identified five phases: ‘incubating, generating, formatting, stabilizing, adjusting’. In a crosscomparison of the case studies and along these phases, we furthermore found typical (groups of) actors, tensions and conflicts. In the focus of our case analyses are the following dimensions: (1) the content of the innovations, (2) actors, networks and communities involved as well as (3) institutions and institutionalization.
Innovations in spatial planning as a social process – phases, actors, conflicts
The aim of this paper is to understand the social process of the emergence and institutionalization of innovations in spatial planning (which we describe as ‘social innovations’). The paper is based on a recently finished empirical and comparative study conducted in four distinct areas of spatial planning in Germany: urban design, neighbourhood development, urban regeneration and regional planning. The empirical cases selected in these areas encompass different topics, historical periods, degrees of maturity and spatial scales of innovation. As a temporal structure of the innovation processes in the different cases we identified five phases: ‘incubating, generating, formatting, stabilizing, adjusting’. In a crosscomparison of the case studies and along these phases, we furthermore found typical (groups of) actors, tensions and conflicts. In the focus of our case analyses are the following dimensions: (1) the content of the innovations, (2) actors, networks and communities involved as well as (3) institutions and institutionalization.
Innovations in spatial planning as a social process – phases, actors, conflicts
Christmann, Gabriela B. (Autor:in) / Ibert, Oliver (Autor:in) / Jessen, Johann (Autor:in) / Walther, Uwe-Jens (Autor:in)
01.01.2020
European Planning Studies ; Vol. 28 ; Iss. 3 ; p. 496-520 ; Taylor&Francis ; London ; ISSN 1469-5944 ; doi:10.1080/09654313.2019.1639399
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
DDC:
710
Innovations in spatial planning as a social process – phases, actors, conflicts
| BASE | 2020
Innovations in spatial planning as a social process – phases, actors, conflicts
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2020
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2020
| BASE | 2020
| BASE | 2020