Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
LiftWEC Deliverable D2.2: Identification of Evaluation Criteria
The objective of this report is to review the existing literature relevant to the early stage evaluation of WECs and propose a set of relevant evaluation criteria for the LiftWEC project. These criteria will be used throughout the LiftWEC project to evaluate the potential of the different concept candidates and will be adapted to the level of maturity of the proposed concepts. Importantly, the criteria should not be used to evaluate the current stage of development of each concept but its potential to become a successfully commercialised WEC. This report describes the identification of the selection criteria. The methodology to benchmark and to score each concept against these criteria will be developed and documented in following deliverables related to Task 2.5. A review of the WEC selection criteria within different ongoing projects has been carried out. The criteria used in such projects are broadly consistent and can be used as a basis of the LiftWEC selection criteria, but they are generally defined from the point of view of an external evaluator of technologies. The criteria are therefore focused on providing an absolute evaluation of a technology, and do not consider the difficulty of developing the concepts up to commercial maturity level (the “developability” of the concept). The interest in conducting a Technology Performance Level (TPL) evaluation of the selected concepts at the end of the LiftWEC project is identified. Based on this literature review, a specification of the LiftWEC criteria was drawn, emphasising the need to provide relative evaluation between concepts which will be grouped into a tighter design space that the one considered by the reviewed project. A structured list of selection criteria is provided, with 5 principals thematic: Energy Production, Affordability, Survivability, Developability, Acceptability Each thematic is then divided into criteria. Notes are provided for each criterion to provide some clarification about the criteria selection and its future scoring methodology. COVID 19 Deviation: Due to the current circumstances related to the outbreak of the COVID 19, the content of this deliverable had to be amended, and the summary of the findings from a delayed workshop are pushed back to the deliverable 2.3. There is no change of content proposed in the descriptions of the projects deliverables when taken together, but the changes simply reflects the required change in schedule. This change is not anticipated to have any significant impact on the delivery of the LiftWEC project. ; This work was produced as part of the LiftWEC Project. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 851885. This output reflects the views only of the author(s), and the European Union cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.
LiftWEC Deliverable D2.2: Identification of Evaluation Criteria
The objective of this report is to review the existing literature relevant to the early stage evaluation of WECs and propose a set of relevant evaluation criteria for the LiftWEC project. These criteria will be used throughout the LiftWEC project to evaluate the potential of the different concept candidates and will be adapted to the level of maturity of the proposed concepts. Importantly, the criteria should not be used to evaluate the current stage of development of each concept but its potential to become a successfully commercialised WEC. This report describes the identification of the selection criteria. The methodology to benchmark and to score each concept against these criteria will be developed and documented in following deliverables related to Task 2.5. A review of the WEC selection criteria within different ongoing projects has been carried out. The criteria used in such projects are broadly consistent and can be used as a basis of the LiftWEC selection criteria, but they are generally defined from the point of view of an external evaluator of technologies. The criteria are therefore focused on providing an absolute evaluation of a technology, and do not consider the difficulty of developing the concepts up to commercial maturity level (the “developability” of the concept). The interest in conducting a Technology Performance Level (TPL) evaluation of the selected concepts at the end of the LiftWEC project is identified. Based on this literature review, a specification of the LiftWEC criteria was drawn, emphasising the need to provide relative evaluation between concepts which will be grouped into a tighter design space that the one considered by the reviewed project. A structured list of selection criteria is provided, with 5 principals thematic: Energy Production, Affordability, Survivability, Developability, Acceptability Each thematic is then divided into criteria. Notes are provided for each criterion to provide some clarification about the criteria selection and its future scoring methodology. COVID 19 Deviation: Due to the current circumstances related to the outbreak of the COVID 19, the content of this deliverable had to be amended, and the summary of the findings from a delayed workshop are pushed back to the deliverable 2.3. There is no change of content proposed in the descriptions of the projects deliverables when taken together, but the changes simply reflects the required change in schedule. This change is not anticipated to have any significant impact on the delivery of the LiftWEC project. ; This work was produced as part of the LiftWEC Project. This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 851885. This output reflects the views only of the author(s), and the European Union cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information contained therein.
LiftWEC Deliverable D2.2: Identification of Evaluation Criteria
Pascal, Rémy (Autor:in)
08.05.2020
oai:zenodo.org:5506926
Paper
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
DDC:
690
Deliverable D2.2: Coordination algorithm and architecture document
Fraunhofer Publica | 2009
|Deliverable D2.2: Coordination algorithm and architecture document
DataCite | 2009
|Meteorological forecast data: Coupling NWP and CFD Modeling. Merging the datasets: Deliverable D2.2
BASE | 2022
|Fraunhofer Publica | 2016
|