Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Memory, Social Interaction, and Communicability in Extraordinary Experiences of Architecture
Using nearly 2,900 entries from a previously documented survey on "Extraordinary Architectural Experiences" (or EAEs), this paper reports in how memory, socialization, and communication affect and, in turn, are affected by the highest aesthetic reception of architecture. More specifically, nine (‘comparative mnemonic impact', ‘fresh recollection', ‘intensity', ‘profoundity', ‘vividness', ‘transformation',‘body reactions', and ‘weeping'), six (‘social company', ‘sharing', ‘non-talking', ‘introspection/silence',‘comparative mnemonic impact', and ‘fresh recollection'), and three (‘verbal', ‘visual', and ‘multimedia'language) categorical variables were gauged to determine the mnemonic, social, and communicability dimensions of EAEs respectively. The data was examined using three subsequent levels of statistical analysis. The results empirically demonstrate that (1) a committed aesthetic engagement of the built environment offers great opportunities for a deep and lasting existential experience; (2) EAEs cause a fundamental change in people's cognitive or affective understanding of architecture; (3) while EAEs are inevitably rooted in first-person phenomenology (i.e., not socially active events), they possess a strong aposteriori social nature; and (4) EAEs resist communication to such an extent as to be considered ineffable. These are findings with practical and theoretical consequences for anyone interested in studying, teaching, or practicing architecture.
Memory, Social Interaction, and Communicability in Extraordinary Experiences of Architecture
Using nearly 2,900 entries from a previously documented survey on "Extraordinary Architectural Experiences" (or EAEs), this paper reports in how memory, socialization, and communication affect and, in turn, are affected by the highest aesthetic reception of architecture. More specifically, nine (‘comparative mnemonic impact', ‘fresh recollection', ‘intensity', ‘profoundity', ‘vividness', ‘transformation',‘body reactions', and ‘weeping'), six (‘social company', ‘sharing', ‘non-talking', ‘introspection/silence',‘comparative mnemonic impact', and ‘fresh recollection'), and three (‘verbal', ‘visual', and ‘multimedia'language) categorical variables were gauged to determine the mnemonic, social, and communicability dimensions of EAEs respectively. The data was examined using three subsequent levels of statistical analysis. The results empirically demonstrate that (1) a committed aesthetic engagement of the built environment offers great opportunities for a deep and lasting existential experience; (2) EAEs cause a fundamental change in people's cognitive or affective understanding of architecture; (3) while EAEs are inevitably rooted in first-person phenomenology (i.e., not socially active events), they possess a strong aposteriori social nature; and (4) EAEs resist communication to such an extent as to be considered ineffable. These are findings with practical and theoretical consequences for anyone interested in studying, teaching, or practicing architecture.
Memory, Social Interaction, and Communicability in Extraordinary Experiences of Architecture
Bermudez, Julio (Autor:in) / Ro, Brandon (Autor:in)
26.06.2014
doi:10.17831/rep:arcc%y232
ARCC Conference Repository; 2013: The Visibility of Research | UNCC 2013
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
DDC:
720
Memory, Social Interaction, and Communicability in Extraordinary Experiences of Architecture
| BASE | 2014
THE SYNTAGM OF THE SURVEY. Analysing to know, communicating to share and sharing communicability
| DOAJ | 2012
Empirical aesthetics: the body and emotion in extraordinary architectural experiences
| BASE | 2014
An extraordinary year, with or without architecture
| British Library Online Contents | 2016