Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Useful funds, disappointing framework : tourism stakeholder experiences of INTERREG
Cross-border tourism cooperation is a fruitful form of engagement between borderland destinations, helping them boost their profile and minimise problems arising from operating near a border. European cross-border tourism cooperation is often supported by a European Union project funding arm known as INTERREG. Our study explores the perceptions and experiences of stakeholders involved in three INTERREG projects between tourism destinations in the Scandinavian borderland region of Jamtland-Trondelag. The aim of the study is to understand why tourism actors in the region decide to apply for INTERREG funds, what their perceptions are towards the project framework, and how their experiences of INTERREG influence their assessment of the programme as a tool for successful cross-border cooperation in tourism. Emerging from a qualitative approach based on in-depth semi-structured interviews, we reveal that the stakeholders involved in the projects see INTERREG as a valuable source of funding in an otherwise under-funded border region, but that they experience a number of problems within the INTERREG framework. The omnipresence of short-term, supranational funded projects is perceived as detrimental to the establishment of sustainable cross-border tourism development within the study region. We recommend that tourism practitioners be more cautious when thinking of (re)applying for INTERREG funding.
Useful funds, disappointing framework : tourism stakeholder experiences of INTERREG
Cross-border tourism cooperation is a fruitful form of engagement between borderland destinations, helping them boost their profile and minimise problems arising from operating near a border. European cross-border tourism cooperation is often supported by a European Union project funding arm known as INTERREG. Our study explores the perceptions and experiences of stakeholders involved in three INTERREG projects between tourism destinations in the Scandinavian borderland region of Jamtland-Trondelag. The aim of the study is to understand why tourism actors in the region decide to apply for INTERREG funds, what their perceptions are towards the project framework, and how their experiences of INTERREG influence their assessment of the programme as a tool for successful cross-border cooperation in tourism. Emerging from a qualitative approach based on in-depth semi-structured interviews, we reveal that the stakeholders involved in the projects see INTERREG as a valuable source of funding in an otherwise under-funded border region, but that they experience a number of problems within the INTERREG framework. The omnipresence of short-term, supranational funded projects is perceived as detrimental to the establishment of sustainable cross-border tourism development within the study region. We recommend that tourism practitioners be more cautious when thinking of (re)applying for INTERREG funding.
Useful funds, disappointing framework : tourism stakeholder experiences of INTERREG
Shepherd, Jack (Autor:in) / Ioannides, Dimitri (Autor:in)
01.01.2020
ISI:000548955200001
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Working on INTERREG IIIB - experiences from British Waterways
British Library Online Contents | 2005
|Interreg grenzüberschreitend - Adressen und Hinweise - Interreg-Sekretariate, Internetseiten
Online Contents | 2004
INTERREG Rhine-Maas Aktivitäten
Online Contents | 2001
|Interreg II C Project << Biodiversity mapping>>
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
|