Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Bidding behavior in the housing market under different market regimes
The aim of this paper is to investigate whether different market regimes affect bidding behavior in housing auctions. Taking advantage of special circumstances in the Norwegian housing market in 2015 and 2016, we conduct a survey involving 1803 respondents in three of Norway's largest cities, Oslo, Stavanger and Trondheim. In the Norwegian housing market 90 percent of dwellings are sold after an English auction. Norway has a rather homogeneous market, with the same laws, traditions, interest rates and approximately the same tax rates applying across the country. However, in December 2016, the two-year nominal house price increase was 34.8 percent in Oslo and 14.8 percent in Trondheim, whereas prices fell 7.8 percent over the same period in Stavanger. We find that households in booming housing markets appear to believe that a more aggressive bidding strategy is advisable to obtain a dwelling at the lowest possible price, compared with households in bust markets. Evidence suggesting that bidders in booming markets are less likely to decide on a maximum price limit before an auction commences substantiates this finding. In addition, we find that bidders in booming markets have a weaker reliance on real estate agents.
Bidding behavior in the housing market under different market regimes
The aim of this paper is to investigate whether different market regimes affect bidding behavior in housing auctions. Taking advantage of special circumstances in the Norwegian housing market in 2015 and 2016, we conduct a survey involving 1803 respondents in three of Norway's largest cities, Oslo, Stavanger and Trondheim. In the Norwegian housing market 90 percent of dwellings are sold after an English auction. Norway has a rather homogeneous market, with the same laws, traditions, interest rates and approximately the same tax rates applying across the country. However, in December 2016, the two-year nominal house price increase was 34.8 percent in Oslo and 14.8 percent in Trondheim, whereas prices fell 7.8 percent over the same period in Stavanger. We find that households in booming housing markets appear to believe that a more aggressive bidding strategy is advisable to obtain a dwelling at the lowest possible price, compared with households in bust markets. Evidence suggesting that bidders in booming markets are less likely to decide on a maximum price limit before an auction commences substantiates this finding. In addition, we find that bidders in booming markets have a weaker reliance on real estate agents.
Bidding behavior in the housing market under different market regimes
Olaussen, Jon Olaf (Autor:in) / Oust, Are (Autor:in) / Sønstebø, Ole Jakob (Autor:in)
01.01.2018
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Forecasting Housing Prices under Different Market Segmentation Assumptions
Online Contents | 2009
|Moving behavior and the housing market
Online Contents | 1995
|Contractor's Opportunistic Bidding Behavior and Equilibrium Price Level in the Construction Market
British Library Online Contents | 2007
|Research on Bidding Methods in Chinese Construction Market
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007
|Challenges for Pipeline Bidding in a Seller's Market
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2007
|