Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Experiences from the Deconstruction of a Timber Building
This study reports on a deconstruction process followed on site, with the purpose of documenting experiences that can help us understand how to design timber buildings for future deconstruction and reuse. The deconstruction concerned three timber buildings built up by volumes (3D modules produced off-site). Modules were in good shape at the time of deconstruction except for some minor local moisture damages. They were all covered and transported to be reused elsewhere. Experiences made included that lack of information on the assumed deconstruction process delayed and complicated the work. A need for disassembly plans was highlighted, including things as order of dismantling, positions of lifting points, weight of modules and positions of screws and amount of screw used. Results indicate that simple, clearly visible joints and services, limit the potential problems and damages during deconstruction. The building should simply be designed to be taken down in the future, the amount of screw allowed should be clearly described and the number of attachments should be limited. Furthermore, the risk of burglary during deconstruction needs to be considered as this may cause damage and delay.
Experiences from the Deconstruction of a Timber Building
This study reports on a deconstruction process followed on site, with the purpose of documenting experiences that can help us understand how to design timber buildings for future deconstruction and reuse. The deconstruction concerned three timber buildings built up by volumes (3D modules produced off-site). Modules were in good shape at the time of deconstruction except for some minor local moisture damages. They were all covered and transported to be reused elsewhere. Experiences made included that lack of information on the assumed deconstruction process delayed and complicated the work. A need for disassembly plans was highlighted, including things as order of dismantling, positions of lifting points, weight of modules and positions of screws and amount of screw used. Results indicate that simple, clearly visible joints and services, limit the potential problems and damages during deconstruction. The building should simply be designed to be taken down in the future, the amount of screw allowed should be clearly described and the number of attachments should be limited. Furthermore, the risk of burglary during deconstruction needs to be considered as this may cause damage and delay.
Experiences from the Deconstruction of a Timber Building
Sandin, Ylva (Autor:in) / Mundt-Petersen, Olof (Autor:in) / Linderoth, Oskar (Autor:in) / Sandberg, Karin (Autor:in)
01.01.2022
Paper
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
DDC:
690
| Wiley | 2010
Advances in Building Deconstruction: A Critical Review to Deconstruction Effectiveness
| Springer Verlag | 2025
Design for Deconstruction: Benefits, Challenges, and Outlook for Timber–Concrete Composite Floors
| DOAJ | 2023
Timber Buildings Deconstruction as a Design Solution toward Near Zero CO2e Emissions
| DOAJ | 2023
Design for deconstruction and reuse of timber structures – state of the art review
| BASE | 2020