Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
On the need for integrating LCA into decision making
The need for sustainable solutions has gained attention both in academia and industry research due to increasing demands of human beings, which are incompatible with limitations in resources availability. Several methods, such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), were developed in the past decades to assess the environmental profile of products and services. However, when decision makers have several alternatives at hand to solve a problem, environmental performance is not the only criterion for choosing the best alternative. Other criteria such as risks and economical costs and benefits that are associated with the alternatives will also influence the final choice. Sometimes the most environmentally sustainable alternative may not be the safest or cheapest one. How to make a balanced decision considering environmental performance together with other criteria is not straight forward. Decision analysis is broadly used to help decision makers identify the best solution among alternatives. The decision is based on expected utility generation, which incorporates consequences (or impacts) associated with each alternative. Depending on the research field and goal of the study, the included consequences can be e.g. environmental impacts, property damages from natural hazards and/or human health impacts. We examined the current decision analysis practice as it is applied in different research fields. The review shows that generally environmental impacts are considered less often than the other consequences. Meanwhile, LCA has been applied in many research fields to assess a wide range of environmental impacts associated with products or services. There is a huge potential for integrating LCA into other decisions analysis tools to include assessments of the environmental profile of alternatives. This will provide the possibility of systematical inclusion of environmental considerations in the decision making process, thus facilitating a more holistic decision. However, due to different scopes and purposes of LCA and other ...
On the need for integrating LCA into decision making
The need for sustainable solutions has gained attention both in academia and industry research due to increasing demands of human beings, which are incompatible with limitations in resources availability. Several methods, such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), were developed in the past decades to assess the environmental profile of products and services. However, when decision makers have several alternatives at hand to solve a problem, environmental performance is not the only criterion for choosing the best alternative. Other criteria such as risks and economical costs and benefits that are associated with the alternatives will also influence the final choice. Sometimes the most environmentally sustainable alternative may not be the safest or cheapest one. How to make a balanced decision considering environmental performance together with other criteria is not straight forward. Decision analysis is broadly used to help decision makers identify the best solution among alternatives. The decision is based on expected utility generation, which incorporates consequences (or impacts) associated with each alternative. Depending on the research field and goal of the study, the included consequences can be e.g. environmental impacts, property damages from natural hazards and/or human health impacts. We examined the current decision analysis practice as it is applied in different research fields. The review shows that generally environmental impacts are considered less often than the other consequences. Meanwhile, LCA has been applied in many research fields to assess a wide range of environmental impacts associated with products or services. There is a huge potential for integrating LCA into other decisions analysis tools to include assessments of the environmental profile of alternatives. This will provide the possibility of systematical inclusion of environmental considerations in the decision making process, thus facilitating a more holistic decision. However, due to different scopes and purposes of LCA and other ...
On the need for integrating LCA into decision making
Dong, Yan (Autor:in) / Miraglia, Simona (Autor:in) / Manzo, Stefano (Autor:in) / Georgiadis, Stylianos (Autor:in) / Sørup, Hjalte Jomo Danielsen (Autor:in) / Boriani, Elena (Autor:in) / Thöns, Sebastian (Autor:in) / Hauschild, Michael Zwicky (Autor:in)
01.01.2016
Dong , Y , Miraglia , S , Manzo , S , Georgiadis , S , Sørup , H J D , Boriani , E , Thöns , S & Hauschild , M Z 2016 , ' On the need for integrating LCA into decision making ' , Sustain-ATV Conference 2016 , Kgs. Lyngby , Denmark , 30/11/2016 - 30/11/2016 . < http://www.sustain.dtu.dk/ >
Aufsatz (Konferenz)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
/dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/affordable_and_clean_energy , /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/responsible_consumption_and_production , name=SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production , name=SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy , name=SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being , /dk/atira/pure/sustainabledevelopmentgoals/good_health_and_well_being
DDC:
690
Integrating GIS into farmland preservation policy and decision making
| Online Contents | 2003
Integrating GIS into farmland preservation policy and decision making
| Elsevier | 2002
Integrating Stakeholders’ Perceptions into Decision-Making for Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2020
| BASE | 2018
| DOAJ | 2025