Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Test and Analysis of Concrete Beams Reinforced by Polyurethane Concrete–Prestressed Steel Wires (PUC–PSWs)
In order to solve the problems of low tensile strength of composite mortar prone to cracking when reinforced concrete beams are strengthened by traditional methods, this paper proposes a new polyurethane concrete–prestressing wire (PUC–PSW) reinforcement method using polyurethane concrete (PUC) as the wire embedding material. Twelve reinforced concrete T-beams were tested for PUC–PSW flexural reinforcement. These consisted of one unreinforced beam, four PSW-reinforced beams and seven PUC–PSW-reinforced beams. The wire embedding material, wire anchorage form, PUC material depth, amount of wire and loading type were used as variables. The test results show that PUC–PSW reinforcement can significantly increase the yield load and ultimate load of the reinforced beams by 24.1% and 44.6%, respectively, compared with PSW reinforcement. When the load reached 90 kN, the crack widths of PSW-reinforced beam A2 and PUC–PSW-reinforced beam A8 were 0.17 mm and 0.1 mm, respectively. The ability of PUC–PSW reinforcement to limit crack development is better than that of PSW reinforcement, especially after the main beam steel yield. The strength, stiffness and crack-limiting ability of the reinforced beam increase with the PUC thickness of the reinforced layer.
Test and Analysis of Concrete Beams Reinforced by Polyurethane Concrete–Prestressed Steel Wires (PUC–PSWs)
In order to solve the problems of low tensile strength of composite mortar prone to cracking when reinforced concrete beams are strengthened by traditional methods, this paper proposes a new polyurethane concrete–prestressing wire (PUC–PSW) reinforcement method using polyurethane concrete (PUC) as the wire embedding material. Twelve reinforced concrete T-beams were tested for PUC–PSW flexural reinforcement. These consisted of one unreinforced beam, four PSW-reinforced beams and seven PUC–PSW-reinforced beams. The wire embedding material, wire anchorage form, PUC material depth, amount of wire and loading type were used as variables. The test results show that PUC–PSW reinforcement can significantly increase the yield load and ultimate load of the reinforced beams by 24.1% and 44.6%, respectively, compared with PSW reinforcement. When the load reached 90 kN, the crack widths of PSW-reinforced beam A2 and PUC–PSW-reinforced beam A8 were 0.17 mm and 0.1 mm, respectively. The ability of PUC–PSW reinforcement to limit crack development is better than that of PSW reinforcement, especially after the main beam steel yield. The strength, stiffness and crack-limiting ability of the reinforced beam increase with the PUC thickness of the reinforced layer.
Test and Analysis of Concrete Beams Reinforced by Polyurethane Concrete–Prestressed Steel Wires (PUC–PSWs)
Wei Li (Autor:in) / Jiaqi Qiu (Autor:in) / Yi Wang (Autor:in) / Xilong Zheng (Autor:in) / Kexin Zhang (Autor:in)
2024
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Beams in prestressed reinforced concrete
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1946
Prestressed Steel-Concrete Composite Beams
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 1999
Tests on prestressed reinforced concrete beams
| TIBKAT | 1970
Concrete splitting and bond in prestressed concrete beams with indented wires
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2001