Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Defining ecological liabilities and structuring ecosystem accounts to support the transition to sustainable societies
Harnessing reliable and relevant information on ecosystems requires focusing and prioritising information acquisition on dimensions of interest. As a boundary object between ecosystem monitoring, research and public decision-making, ecosystem accounting can serve this purpose. We develop an argument in favour of a set of accounts, consistent with the statistical standard part of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA-EA), that explicitly links monetary accounts to ecosystem extent and condition accounts. The ecosystem condition account is structured in three categories reflecting the main values motivating integrated ecosystem management targets and notions of «good ecological status». These categories are: (i) the maintenance of their heritage dimensions, (ii) their capacity to sustainably provide ecosystem services and (iii) the maintenance of their overall functionality. We discuss how such ecosystem accounts and associated monitoring can form the basis both for assessing an ecological debt by using a cost-based approach and for designing an action-orientated information system suitable to support the transition towards sustainable societies.
Defining ecological liabilities and structuring ecosystem accounts to support the transition to sustainable societies
Harnessing reliable and relevant information on ecosystems requires focusing and prioritising information acquisition on dimensions of interest. As a boundary object between ecosystem monitoring, research and public decision-making, ecosystem accounting can serve this purpose. We develop an argument in favour of a set of accounts, consistent with the statistical standard part of the System of Environmental-Economic Accounting (SEEA-EA), that explicitly links monetary accounts to ecosystem extent and condition accounts. The ecosystem condition account is structured in three categories reflecting the main values motivating integrated ecosystem management targets and notions of «good ecological status». These categories are: (i) the maintenance of their heritage dimensions, (ii) their capacity to sustainably provide ecosystem services and (iii) the maintenance of their overall functionality. We discuss how such ecosystem accounts and associated monitoring can form the basis both for assessing an ecological debt by using a cost-based approach and for designing an action-orientated information system suitable to support the transition towards sustainable societies.
Defining ecological liabilities and structuring ecosystem accounts to support the transition to sustainable societies
Yann Kervinio (Autor:in) / Clément Surun (Autor:in) / Adrien Comte (Autor:in) / Harold Levrel (Autor:in)
2023
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Structuring Sustainable Thermal Breaks: Opportunities and Liabilities
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2010
|Security/Life Safety DEFINING RISK IDENTIFYING WAYS TO REDUCE RISKS AND LIABILITIES
British Library Online Contents | 2004
|Structuring Sustainable Construction Contracts
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996
|