Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
For our empirical research, the 2012 implementation of China's National Agricultural Water-Saving Outline serves as a quasi-experiment. In addition, one of the main regions in China for grain production is the Yellow River Basin. Based on this, we utilize a Difference-in-Difference (DID) empirical technique to assess the impact of the agricultural water-saving policy on food security using data from prefectures in China's Yellow River Basin from 2000 to 2020. According to the estimated results, grain production has greatly increased as a result of the agricultural water-saving policy. This conclusion still holds when other water-related policies are considered. The agricultural water-saving policy may enhance other input factors in grain production by assuring water demand, which is one possible mechanism of the influence. The empirical results show that the policy indeed increases the water productivity in agricultural production, which will ensure the effective water utilization in agricultural production, and the grain sown area, which is the most important production factor in agriculture. In heterogeneity analysis, the impact of the policy on food security is the largest in the lower reach, followed by the middle reach and the smallest in the upper reach in the Yellow River Basin. HIGHLIGHTS A Difference-in-Difference (DID) technique is employed to estimate the impact of the agricultural water-saving policy on grain yield in China.; The agricultural water-saving policy increases grain yield, thus improving food security in China.; The possible reason for the increase in grain yield is the increased agricultural water productivity as well as the grain sown area in China.;
For our empirical research, the 2012 implementation of China's National Agricultural Water-Saving Outline serves as a quasi-experiment. In addition, one of the main regions in China for grain production is the Yellow River Basin. Based on this, we utilize a Difference-in-Difference (DID) empirical technique to assess the impact of the agricultural water-saving policy on food security using data from prefectures in China's Yellow River Basin from 2000 to 2020. According to the estimated results, grain production has greatly increased as a result of the agricultural water-saving policy. This conclusion still holds when other water-related policies are considered. The agricultural water-saving policy may enhance other input factors in grain production by assuring water demand, which is one possible mechanism of the influence. The empirical results show that the policy indeed increases the water productivity in agricultural production, which will ensure the effective water utilization in agricultural production, and the grain sown area, which is the most important production factor in agriculture. In heterogeneity analysis, the impact of the policy on food security is the largest in the lower reach, followed by the middle reach and the smallest in the upper reach in the Yellow River Basin. HIGHLIGHTS A Difference-in-Difference (DID) technique is employed to estimate the impact of the agricultural water-saving policy on grain yield in China.; The agricultural water-saving policy increases grain yield, thus improving food security in China.; The possible reason for the increase in grain yield is the increased agricultural water productivity as well as the grain sown area in China.;
Does agricultural water-saving policy improve food security? Evidence from the Yellow River Basin in China
2023
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
An improved method for integrated water security assessment in the Yellow River basin, China
British Library Online Contents | 2015
|Water Management in the Yellow River Basin of China
UB Braunschweig | 2021
|Decoupling Agricultural Grey Water Footprint from Economic Growth in the Yellow River Basin
DOAJ | 2024
|