Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Cross-watershed leakage of agricultural nutrient runoff
Agricultural nutrient runoff has been a major contributor to hypoxia in many downstream coastal ecosystems. Although programs have been designed to reduce nutrient loading in individual coastal waters, cross watershed interdependencies of nutrient runoff have not been quantified due to a lack of suitable modeling tools. Cross-watershed pollution leakage can occur when nutrient runoff moves from more to less regulated regions. We illustrate the use of an integrated assessment model IAM that combines economic and process-based biophysical tools to quantify Nitrogen loading leakage across three major US watersheds. We also assess losses in consumer and producer surplus from decreased commodity supply and higher prices when nutrient delivery to select coastal ecosystems is restricted. Reducing agricultural N loading in the Gulf of Mexico by 45% (a) increases loading in the Chesapeake Bay and Western Lake Erie by 4.2% and 5.5%, respectively, and (b) results in annual surplus losses of $7.1 and $6.95 billion with and without restrictions on leakage to the Chesapeake Bay and Lake Erie, respectively.
Cross-watershed leakage of agricultural nutrient runoff
Agricultural nutrient runoff has been a major contributor to hypoxia in many downstream coastal ecosystems. Although programs have been designed to reduce nutrient loading in individual coastal waters, cross watershed interdependencies of nutrient runoff have not been quantified due to a lack of suitable modeling tools. Cross-watershed pollution leakage can occur when nutrient runoff moves from more to less regulated regions. We illustrate the use of an integrated assessment model IAM that combines economic and process-based biophysical tools to quantify Nitrogen loading leakage across three major US watersheds. We also assess losses in consumer and producer surplus from decreased commodity supply and higher prices when nutrient delivery to select coastal ecosystems is restricted. Reducing agricultural N loading in the Gulf of Mexico by 45% (a) increases loading in the Chesapeake Bay and Western Lake Erie by 4.2% and 5.5%, respectively, and (b) results in annual surplus losses of $7.1 and $6.95 billion with and without restrictions on leakage to the Chesapeake Bay and Lake Erie, respectively.
Cross-watershed leakage of agricultural nutrient runoff
Taiwo Akinyemi (Autor:in) / Levan Elbakidze (Autor:in) / Yuelu Xu (Autor:in) / Philip W Gassman (Autor:in) / Haw Yen (Autor:in) / Jeffrey G Arnold (Autor:in)
2024
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Trends in nutrient runoff from agricultural basins in Norway
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
|Rainfall Runoff Modeling in Agricultural Watershed Using 2D Shallow Water Equations
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2012
|Evaluation of SWAT sub-daily runoff estimation at small agricultural watershed in Korea
Springer Verlag | 2012
|A renovated model for spatial analysis of pollutant runoff loads in agricultural watershed
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1998
|Rainfall-Runoff Modelling on Periurban Watershed
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1996
|