Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Phenomenon of «site» and «non-site» in the post-industrial city ФЕНОМЕН «МЕСТА» И «НЕ-МЕСТА»В ПОСТИНДУСТРИАЛЬНОМ ГОРОДЕ
In the first part of the article, notions of «τόπος» and «hora» are opposed as the archetypes of «the place». For example, a more exact size of a place (the size that appeals to the characteristics of “topos”) can be defined using cartographical terms measured a priori or through the connection with other places. As for the size of “hora”, it is characterized by a certain degree of relativity. In the second part of the article, subjective and objective connections of a person and a place are analyzed. Etienne Souriau`s point of view is cited as an example. According to his opinion, a certain part of the space can represent a place on condition that it is the subject of cognition. Also, Georges Perec`s view is considered, according to which a measurable size of a place doesn`t always coincide with a perceptional, tangible size (which is a characteristic of “hora”). A similar reflection can be found in Martin Heidegger`s, Maurice Merleau-Ponty`s, Georges Didi-Huberman`s researches. Positions of representatives of the humanistic geography are studied. They believe that a place has a size of “hora”, not a topographical size. That is, a place is determined not through geographical coordinates (a position in space) but through the meaning which people attribute to a certain part of space.The third part of the article has the author’s reflections about the fact that the 20th century brought the notion of «non-place» as opposed to the notion of «place». This term was introduced by French anthropologist Marc Augé. The notion of «non-place» is opposed to the notion of «anthropological place» (lieu antropologique), that is opposed to the place which has anthropological characteristics. «Non-places» are spaces without their own sense and purpose. They give rise to new scales of communication, relations and movements in the post-industrial society.
Проанализированы понятия «топос», «хора» и «место», а также феномен появления «не-мест» ( non-lieu, non-site ), которые противопоставляются «антропологическим местам» ( lieu antropologique ) в архитектуре европейского города постиндустриального периода.
Phenomenon of «site» and «non-site» in the post-industrial city ФЕНОМЕН «МЕСТА» И «НЕ-МЕСТА»В ПОСТИНДУСТРИАЛЬНОМ ГОРОДЕ
In the first part of the article, notions of «τόπος» and «hora» are opposed as the archetypes of «the place». For example, a more exact size of a place (the size that appeals to the characteristics of “topos”) can be defined using cartographical terms measured a priori or through the connection with other places. As for the size of “hora”, it is characterized by a certain degree of relativity. In the second part of the article, subjective and objective connections of a person and a place are analyzed. Etienne Souriau`s point of view is cited as an example. According to his opinion, a certain part of the space can represent a place on condition that it is the subject of cognition. Also, Georges Perec`s view is considered, according to which a measurable size of a place doesn`t always coincide with a perceptional, tangible size (which is a characteristic of “hora”). A similar reflection can be found in Martin Heidegger`s, Maurice Merleau-Ponty`s, Georges Didi-Huberman`s researches. Positions of representatives of the humanistic geography are studied. They believe that a place has a size of “hora”, not a topographical size. That is, a place is determined not through geographical coordinates (a position in space) but through the meaning which people attribute to a certain part of space.The third part of the article has the author’s reflections about the fact that the 20th century brought the notion of «non-place» as opposed to the notion of «place». This term was introduced by French anthropologist Marc Augé. The notion of «non-place» is opposed to the notion of «anthropological place» (lieu antropologique), that is opposed to the place which has anthropological characteristics. «Non-places» are spaces without their own sense and purpose. They give rise to new scales of communication, relations and movements in the post-industrial society.
Проанализированы понятия «топос», «хора» и «место», а также феномен появления «не-мест» ( non-lieu, non-site ), которые противопоставляются «антропологическим местам» ( lieu antropologique ) в архитектуре европейского города постиндустриального периода.
Phenomenon of «site» and «non-site» in the post-industrial city ФЕНОМЕН «МЕСТА» И «НЕ-МЕСТА»В ПОСТИНДУСТРИАЛЬНОМ ГОРОДЕ
Skopina Maria Valentinovna (Autor:in)
2013
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
topos , khora , site , non-site , postindustrial city , city , топос , хора , место , не-место , постиндустриальный город , город , Architecture , NA1-9428 , Construction industry , HD9715-9717.5
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
ТРИБУНА, ИМЕЮЩАЯ ВЫСОКИЕ МЕСТА И ДИСПЛЕЙ ПЕРСОНАЛЬНЫХ ДАННЫХ
Europäisches Patentamt | 2016
| DOAJ | 2021