Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Financial and Economic Investment Evaluation of Wastewater Treatment Plant
Improved Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) analysis requires a broader analytical framework, in order to perceive each project individually from the perspective of potentially measurable and significant effects on the environment and society as a whole. The main goal of our paper is to assess the financial and economic justification for variant V3 (as the most technically optimal) of the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) construction project in Nov Dojran, North Macedonia, with the purpose of advancing municipal infrastructure and environmental benefits from improved water treatment. Based on the economic analysis conducted, we conclude that the investment in the WWTP project is justified, because the economic internal rate of return is higher than the opportunity cost of capital (EIRR = 16.38%), the economic net present value is higher than 0, and EBCR (benefit-cost ratio) is greater than 1 (EBCR = 2.11). The highest environmental benefit of 49.2% in total environmental benefits is associated with nitrogen, while phosphorus is the next pollutant in the structure of environmental benefits at 46.1%. The environmental benefits of removing biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) are significantly less important, despite the removal of significant amounts of these pollutants during treatment. The situation is similar with suspended particles.
Financial and Economic Investment Evaluation of Wastewater Treatment Plant
Improved Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) analysis requires a broader analytical framework, in order to perceive each project individually from the perspective of potentially measurable and significant effects on the environment and society as a whole. The main goal of our paper is to assess the financial and economic justification for variant V3 (as the most technically optimal) of the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) construction project in Nov Dojran, North Macedonia, with the purpose of advancing municipal infrastructure and environmental benefits from improved water treatment. Based on the economic analysis conducted, we conclude that the investment in the WWTP project is justified, because the economic internal rate of return is higher than the opportunity cost of capital (EIRR = 16.38%), the economic net present value is higher than 0, and EBCR (benefit-cost ratio) is greater than 1 (EBCR = 2.11). The highest environmental benefit of 49.2% in total environmental benefits is associated with nitrogen, while phosphorus is the next pollutant in the structure of environmental benefits at 46.1%. The environmental benefits of removing biological oxygen demand (BOD) and chemical oxygen demand (COD) are significantly less important, despite the removal of significant amounts of these pollutants during treatment. The situation is similar with suspended particles.
Financial and Economic Investment Evaluation of Wastewater Treatment Plant
Jasmina Ćetković (Autor:in) / Miloš Knežević (Autor:in) / Slobodan Lakić (Autor:in) / Miloš Žarković (Autor:in) / Radoje Vujadinović (Autor:in) / Angelina Živković (Autor:in) / Jelena Cvijović (Autor:in)
2022
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Wastewater Treatment Plant Evaluation Toolkit
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2012
|Economic Analyses of the Seadrift Wind-Aided Wastewater Treatment Plant Operations
BASE | 2021
|Evaluation of the wastewater treatment plant of Rome airport
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1997
|Wastewater Treatment Plant Design
TIBKAT | 1982
Evaluation of Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plant in Rural Areas
Springer Verlag | 2022
|