Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
To a critique of space in architectural discourse
What is it worth to constantly use the word ‘space’ in contexts related to architecture, urbanism or even ‘new urbanism’? Is there anything real and effective behind it so that we can work with or at least adequately understand and reliably use it in professional and common cultural communications? Where did the habit of using this word come from and what has it replaced? The roots of these questions are in new European rational thinking, but today we are reaping the fruits. In the article, the structure of which imitates I. Kant’s Critiques, the author makes an attempt to critically comprehend these questions.
To a critique of space in architectural discourse
What is it worth to constantly use the word ‘space’ in contexts related to architecture, urbanism or even ‘new urbanism’? Is there anything real and effective behind it so that we can work with or at least adequately understand and reliably use it in professional and common cultural communications? Where did the habit of using this word come from and what has it replaced? The roots of these questions are in new European rational thinking, but today we are reaping the fruits. In the article, the structure of which imitates I. Kant’s Critiques, the author makes an attempt to critically comprehend these questions.
To a critique of space in architectural discourse
2024
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Critique: Architectural competitions
Online Contents | 2003
|Critique: Tokyo's architectural wonders
British Library Online Contents | 2008
|Critique: Tokyo's architectural wonders
Online Contents | 2008
|Embodied reasoning in architectural critique
Online Contents | 2012
|Embodied reasoning in architectural critique
British Library Online Contents | 2012
|