Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Laboratory Performance of Asphalt Concrete containing Foamed Bitumen from extraction of Buton Natural Asphalt
This study examines the performance of asphalt concrete mixtures using foamed bitumen derived from extracted Buton natural asphalt (Asbuton) in comparison to conventional penetration asphalt (Pen 60/70). The research focuses on evaluating key parameters such as aggregate properties, Marshall stability, indirect tensile strength, and other mix characteristics, benchmarked against Indonesian national standards. Asbuton, known for its high viscosity and resistance to extreme conditions, offers an alternative binder for sustainable road infrastructure development. The results demonstrate that foamed Asbuton significantly outperforms Pen 60/70 in critical metrics. Foamed Asbuton achieved higher stability (2440.8 kg) and a superior tensile strength ratio (92.78%), reflecting its robustness under heavy loads and resistance to moisture-induced damage. In contrast, Pen 60/70 exhibited reduced stability and rigidity when subjected to the foaming process. The enhanced performance of foamed Asbuton is attributed to its dense structure and the benefits of the foaming process, which improves aggregate coating and binder distribution at lower mixing temperatures. This study highlights the potential of foamed bitumen technology, particularly when paired with high-performance binders like Asbuton, to improve the durability and sustainability of road infrastructure. Foamed Asbuton emerges as a promising material for high-stress applications and extreme environmental conditions.
Laboratory Performance of Asphalt Concrete containing Foamed Bitumen from extraction of Buton Natural Asphalt
This study examines the performance of asphalt concrete mixtures using foamed bitumen derived from extracted Buton natural asphalt (Asbuton) in comparison to conventional penetration asphalt (Pen 60/70). The research focuses on evaluating key parameters such as aggregate properties, Marshall stability, indirect tensile strength, and other mix characteristics, benchmarked against Indonesian national standards. Asbuton, known for its high viscosity and resistance to extreme conditions, offers an alternative binder for sustainable road infrastructure development. The results demonstrate that foamed Asbuton significantly outperforms Pen 60/70 in critical metrics. Foamed Asbuton achieved higher stability (2440.8 kg) and a superior tensile strength ratio (92.78%), reflecting its robustness under heavy loads and resistance to moisture-induced damage. In contrast, Pen 60/70 exhibited reduced stability and rigidity when subjected to the foaming process. The enhanced performance of foamed Asbuton is attributed to its dense structure and the benefits of the foaming process, which improves aggregate coating and binder distribution at lower mixing temperatures. This study highlights the potential of foamed bitumen technology, particularly when paired with high-performance binders like Asbuton, to improve the durability and sustainability of road infrastructure. Foamed Asbuton emerges as a promising material for high-stress applications and extreme environmental conditions.
Laboratory Performance of Asphalt Concrete containing Foamed Bitumen from extraction of Buton Natural Asphalt
Harmein Rahman (Autor:in) / Raihan Arditama Harnedi (Autor:in) / Fanny Tri Novitasari Siregar (Autor:in) / Yongjoo Kim (Autor:in) / Kanghun Lee (Autor:in) / Ilhwan Kang (Autor:in)
2024
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Laboratory Investigation on Porous Asphalt Using Buton Rock Asphalt (BRA) Extraction
Springer Verlag | 2025
|Utilization of Buton Natural Rock Asphalt as Additive of Bitumen Binder in Hot Mix Asphalt Mixtures
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2013
|Utilization of Buton Natural Rock Asphalt as Additive of Bitumen Binder in Hot Mix Asphalt Mixtures
Trans Tech Publications | 2013
|FOAMED BITUMEN MIX: SOIL OR ASPHALT?
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2002
|