Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
A Hydraulic Friction Model for One-Dimensional Unsteady Channel Flows with Experimental Demonstration
As a critical parameter of the steady uniform friction model, the roughness coefficient changes with flow unsteadiness in flood events; i.e., the flow conditions of the stream segment significantly affect the flow resistance. In this study, a modified formula was established to improve the unsteady friction simulation; ten terms relating to the first- and second-order time and space partial derivatives of hydraulic parameters were selected as additional terms. The results of a hydraulic experiment show that the hysteresis between flow depth and mean cross-sectional velocity cannot be neglected in unsteady flows that disturb the performance of a steady uniform friction model. Six terms have a strong correlation with objective friction. Further, three of them have a small variance in correlation coefficient. Then, the composition of the proposed formula was determined. The results show that adding too many additional terms provides better performance in the calibration phase, yet reduces the accuracy of the validation phase because of an overfitting phenomenon. The optimal number of additional terms is three, and the established formula can improve the unsteady friction simulation.
A Hydraulic Friction Model for One-Dimensional Unsteady Channel Flows with Experimental Demonstration
As a critical parameter of the steady uniform friction model, the roughness coefficient changes with flow unsteadiness in flood events; i.e., the flow conditions of the stream segment significantly affect the flow resistance. In this study, a modified formula was established to improve the unsteady friction simulation; ten terms relating to the first- and second-order time and space partial derivatives of hydraulic parameters were selected as additional terms. The results of a hydraulic experiment show that the hysteresis between flow depth and mean cross-sectional velocity cannot be neglected in unsteady flows that disturb the performance of a steady uniform friction model. Six terms have a strong correlation with objective friction. Further, three of them have a small variance in correlation coefficient. Then, the composition of the proposed formula was determined. The results show that adding too many additional terms provides better performance in the calibration phase, yet reduces the accuracy of the validation phase because of an overfitting phenomenon. The optimal number of additional terms is three, and the established formula can improve the unsteady friction simulation.
A Hydraulic Friction Model for One-Dimensional Unsteady Channel Flows with Experimental Demonstration
Weimin Bao (Autor:in) / Junwei Zhou (Autor:in) / Xiaohua Xiang (Autor:in) / Peng Jiang (Autor:in) / Muxi Bao (Autor:in)
2018
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Study on the hydraulic reaction of unsteady flows in open channel
British Library Online Contents | 2006
|A weighting function model for unsteady open channel friction
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2022
|Experimental Study on Turbulent Structures in Unsteady Open-Channel Flows
British Library Online Contents | 1994
|Three-dimensional unsteady RANS model for hydraulic jumps
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2021
|A Two-Dimensional TVD Scheme for Unsteady Open Channel Flows Simulation
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2001
|