Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Accuracy Assessment of Total Stem Volume Using Close-Range Sensing: Advances in Precision Forestry
Accurate collection of dendrometric information is essential for improving decision confidence and supporting potential advances in forest management planning (FMP). Total stem volume is an important forest inventory parameter that requires high accuracy. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) has emerged as one of the most promising tools for automatically measuring total stem height and diameter at breast height (DBH) with very high detail. This study compares the accuracy of different methods for extracting the total stem height and DBH to estimate total stem volume from TLS data. Our results show that estimates of stem volume using the random sample consensus (RANSAC) and convex hull and HTSP methods are more accurate (bias = 0.004 for RANSAC and bias = 0.009 for convex hull and HTSP) than those using the circle fitting method (bias = 0.046). Furthermore, the RANSAC method had the best performance with the lowest bias and the highest percentage of accuracy (78.89%). The results of this study provide insight into the performance and accuracy of the tested methods for tree-level stem volume estimation, and allow for the further development of improved methods for point-cloud-based data collection with the goal of supporting potential advances in precision forestry.
Accuracy Assessment of Total Stem Volume Using Close-Range Sensing: Advances in Precision Forestry
Accurate collection of dendrometric information is essential for improving decision confidence and supporting potential advances in forest management planning (FMP). Total stem volume is an important forest inventory parameter that requires high accuracy. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) has emerged as one of the most promising tools for automatically measuring total stem height and diameter at breast height (DBH) with very high detail. This study compares the accuracy of different methods for extracting the total stem height and DBH to estimate total stem volume from TLS data. Our results show that estimates of stem volume using the random sample consensus (RANSAC) and convex hull and HTSP methods are more accurate (bias = 0.004 for RANSAC and bias = 0.009 for convex hull and HTSP) than those using the circle fitting method (bias = 0.046). Furthermore, the RANSAC method had the best performance with the lowest bias and the highest percentage of accuracy (78.89%). The results of this study provide insight into the performance and accuracy of the tested methods for tree-level stem volume estimation, and allow for the further development of improved methods for point-cloud-based data collection with the goal of supporting potential advances in precision forestry.
Accuracy Assessment of Total Stem Volume Using Close-Range Sensing: Advances in Precision Forestry
Dimitrios Panagiotidis (Autor:in) / Azadeh Abdollahnejad (Autor:in)
2021
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Electronics, Close-Range Sensors and Artificial Intelligence in Forestry
DOAJ | 2022
|Forestry close to nature in beech forests
Online Contents | 2007
|CLOSE RANGE PHOTOGRAMMETRY IN VOLUME COMPUTING
British Library Online Contents | 2010
|Hyper Redundancy for Accuracy Enhancement in Automated Close Range Photogrammetry
Online Contents | 2005
|Positional accuracy in close-range photogrammetry through Topography and Geodesy
DOAJ | 2023
|