Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Hydrodynamic Border Irrigation Model: Comparison of Infiltration Equations
The variation in moisture content between subsequent irrigations determines the use of infiltration equations that contain representative physical parameters of the soil when irrigation begins. This study analyzes the reliability of the hydrodynamic model to simulate the advanced phase in border irrigation. For the solution of the hydrodynamic model, a Lagrangian scheme in implicit finite differences is used, while for infiltration, the Kostiakov equation and the Green and Ampt equation are used and compared. The latter was solved using the Newton–Raphson method due to its implicit nature. The models were validated, and unknown parameters were optimized using experimental data available in the literature and the Levenberg–Marquardt method. The results show that it is necessary to use infiltration equations based on soil parameters, because in subsequent irrigations, the initial conditions change, modifying the advance curve in border irrigation. From the coupling of both equations, it is shown that the empirical Kostiakov equation is only representative for a specific irrigation event, while with the Green and Ampt equations, the subsequent irrigations can be modeled, and the advance/infiltration process can be observed in detail.
Hydrodynamic Border Irrigation Model: Comparison of Infiltration Equations
The variation in moisture content between subsequent irrigations determines the use of infiltration equations that contain representative physical parameters of the soil when irrigation begins. This study analyzes the reliability of the hydrodynamic model to simulate the advanced phase in border irrigation. For the solution of the hydrodynamic model, a Lagrangian scheme in implicit finite differences is used, while for infiltration, the Kostiakov equation and the Green and Ampt equation are used and compared. The latter was solved using the Newton–Raphson method due to its implicit nature. The models were validated, and unknown parameters were optimized using experimental data available in the literature and the Levenberg–Marquardt method. The results show that it is necessary to use infiltration equations based on soil parameters, because in subsequent irrigations, the initial conditions change, modifying the advance curve in border irrigation. From the coupling of both equations, it is shown that the empirical Kostiakov equation is only representative for a specific irrigation event, while with the Green and Ampt equations, the subsequent irrigations can be modeled, and the advance/infiltration process can be observed in detail.
Hydrodynamic Border Irrigation Model: Comparison of Infiltration Equations
Sebastián Fuentes (Autor:in) / Carlos Chávez (Autor:in) / Fernando Brambila-Paz (Autor:in) / Josué Trejo-Alonso (Autor:in)
2022
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
Complete Hydrodynamic Border-Strip Irrigation Model
| British Library Online Contents | 1996
Determining infiltration rates in irrigation border
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1960
Infiltration Evaluation Strategy for Border Irrigation Management
| British Library Online Contents | 2011
Complete Hydrodynamic Border-Strip Irrigation Model. Vivekanand Singh and S. Murty Bhallamudi
| British Library Online Contents | 1997
Evaluation of Closed-End Border Irrigation Accounting for Soil Infiltration Variability
| British Library Online Contents | 2017