Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Stability Comparison Between Grid-forming and Grid-following Based Wind Farms Integrated MMC-HVDC
Grid-forming (GFM) control based high-voltage DC (HVDC) systems and renewable energy sources (RESs) provide support for enhancing the stability of power systems. However, the interaction and coordination of frequency support between the GFM-based modular multilevel converter based HVDC (MMC-HVDC) and grid-following (GFL) based RESs or GFM-based RESs have not been fully investigated, which are examined in this study. First, the detailed AC- and DC-side impedances of GFM-based MMC-HVDC are analyzed. The impedance characteristics of GFL- and GFM-based wind turbines are next analyzed. Then, the influences of GFL- and GFM-based wind farms (WFs) on the DC- and AC-side stabilities of WF-integrated MMC-HVDC systems are compared and evaluated. The results show that the GFM-based wind turbine performs better than the GFL-based wind turbine. Accordingly, to support a receiving-end AC system, the corresponding frequency supporting strategies are proposed based on the GFM control for WF-integrated MMC-HVDC systems. The GFM-based WF outperforms the GFL-based WF in terms of stability and response time. Simulations in PSCAD/EMTDC demonstrate the DC- and AC-side stability issues and seamless grid support from the RESs, i.e., WFs, to the receiving-end AC system.
Stability Comparison Between Grid-forming and Grid-following Based Wind Farms Integrated MMC-HVDC
Grid-forming (GFM) control based high-voltage DC (HVDC) systems and renewable energy sources (RESs) provide support for enhancing the stability of power systems. However, the interaction and coordination of frequency support between the GFM-based modular multilevel converter based HVDC (MMC-HVDC) and grid-following (GFL) based RESs or GFM-based RESs have not been fully investigated, which are examined in this study. First, the detailed AC- and DC-side impedances of GFM-based MMC-HVDC are analyzed. The impedance characteristics of GFL- and GFM-based wind turbines are next analyzed. Then, the influences of GFL- and GFM-based wind farms (WFs) on the DC- and AC-side stabilities of WF-integrated MMC-HVDC systems are compared and evaluated. The results show that the GFM-based wind turbine performs better than the GFL-based wind turbine. Accordingly, to support a receiving-end AC system, the corresponding frequency supporting strategies are proposed based on the GFM control for WF-integrated MMC-HVDC systems. The GFM-based WF outperforms the GFL-based WF in terms of stability and response time. Simulations in PSCAD/EMTDC demonstrate the DC- and AC-side stability issues and seamless grid support from the RESs, i.e., WFs, to the receiving-end AC system.
Stability Comparison Between Grid-forming and Grid-following Based Wind Farms Integrated MMC-HVDC
Rongcai Pan (Autor:in) / Dong Liu (Autor:in) / Shan Liu (Autor:in) / Jie Yang (Autor:in) / Longze Kou (Autor:in) / Guangfu Tang (Autor:in)
2023
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
BASE | 2017
|DOAJ | 2021
|