Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
The Codified Representation of Drawing in Territorial Systems in the Field of Urban Planning Instruments
The design crisis, specifically in the drawing of urban planning, coincided with a decisive state came out at the end of the last century, that is the crisis of place’s drawings itself. In the past and in the present the most learned intellectuals of the architecture and planning shared this statement. In fact, within the institutional system there has been an ongoing loss related to the knowledge and understanding tout court of the drawing. The IT systems have certainly achieved advanced levels of definition and complexity in acquiring and processing the reality datum, and they encouraged new interests which have proven to have overcome the ancient time, as well as his thought, made it insignificant. In this way the frenetic need to combine a mix of participatory variability, addressed to a pluralism, has defined custom paths between hybrid forms, graphic superstructures of languages and indistinct modeling. Thus, it was decided to replace the drawing with extraneous shapes, promoting the suggestions given by the video modeling or by three-dimensional graphic. These forms of processing the great have paralyzed intuition, the knowledge of the space of the few that can be much deeper than the first. The need is first of all to consider drawing as thought, even in its tradition, as a geometric foundation, rather than as a code. Then the drawing, the representation, becomes again a scientific based work tool on which to order and to make linked the intelligible relationships in the principle of the Samonian unity of urban architecture.
The Codified Representation of Drawing in Territorial Systems in the Field of Urban Planning Instruments
The design crisis, specifically in the drawing of urban planning, coincided with a decisive state came out at the end of the last century, that is the crisis of place’s drawings itself. In the past and in the present the most learned intellectuals of the architecture and planning shared this statement. In fact, within the institutional system there has been an ongoing loss related to the knowledge and understanding tout court of the drawing. The IT systems have certainly achieved advanced levels of definition and complexity in acquiring and processing the reality datum, and they encouraged new interests which have proven to have overcome the ancient time, as well as his thought, made it insignificant. In this way the frenetic need to combine a mix of participatory variability, addressed to a pluralism, has defined custom paths between hybrid forms, graphic superstructures of languages and indistinct modeling. Thus, it was decided to replace the drawing with extraneous shapes, promoting the suggestions given by the video modeling or by three-dimensional graphic. These forms of processing the great have paralyzed intuition, the knowledge of the space of the few that can be much deeper than the first. The need is first of all to consider drawing as thought, even in its tradition, as a geometric foundation, rather than as a code. Then the drawing, the representation, becomes again a scientific based work tool on which to order and to make linked the intelligible relationships in the principle of the Samonian unity of urban architecture.
The Codified Representation of Drawing in Territorial Systems in the Field of Urban Planning Instruments
Andrea Donelli (Autor:in)
2018
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
BASE | 2018
|Codified Risk-Based Inspection Planning
British Library Online Contents | 2002
|Risk-Based Inspection Planning - Codified Risk-Based Inspection Planning
Online Contents | 2002
|Codified reliability of structures
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995
|