Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Ensuring that offsets and other internationally transferred mitigation outcomes contribute effectively to limiting global warming
Ensuring the environmental integrity of internationally transferred mitigation outcomes, whether through offset arrangements, a market mechanism or non-market approaches, is a priority for the implementation of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. Any conventional transferred mitigation outcome, such as an offset agreement, that involves exchanging greenhouse gases with different lifetimes can increase global warming on some timescales. We show that a simple ‘do no harm’ principle regarding the choice of metrics to use in such transactions can be used to guard against this, noting that it may also be applicable in other contexts such as voluntary and compliance carbon markets. We also show that both approximate and exact ‘warming equivalent’ exchanges are possible, but present challenges of implementation in any conventional market. Warming-equivalent emissions may, however, be useful in formulating warming budgets in a two-basket approach to mitigation and in reporting contributions to warming in the context of the global stocktake.
Ensuring that offsets and other internationally transferred mitigation outcomes contribute effectively to limiting global warming
Ensuring the environmental integrity of internationally transferred mitigation outcomes, whether through offset arrangements, a market mechanism or non-market approaches, is a priority for the implementation of Article 6 of the Paris Agreement. Any conventional transferred mitigation outcome, such as an offset agreement, that involves exchanging greenhouse gases with different lifetimes can increase global warming on some timescales. We show that a simple ‘do no harm’ principle regarding the choice of metrics to use in such transactions can be used to guard against this, noting that it may also be applicable in other contexts such as voluntary and compliance carbon markets. We also show that both approximate and exact ‘warming equivalent’ exchanges are possible, but present challenges of implementation in any conventional market. Warming-equivalent emissions may, however, be useful in formulating warming budgets in a two-basket approach to mitigation and in reporting contributions to warming in the context of the global stocktake.
Ensuring that offsets and other internationally transferred mitigation outcomes contribute effectively to limiting global warming
Myles Allen (Autor:in) / Katsumasa Tanaka (Autor:in) / Adrian Macey (Autor:in) / Michelle Cain (Autor:in) / Stuart Jenkins (Autor:in) / John Lynch (Autor:in) / Matthew Smith (Autor:in)
2021
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Unbekannt
Metadata by DOAJ is licensed under CC BY-SA 1.0
UNEP/GRID AND GLOBAL WARMING MITIGATION
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995
|Limiting-State Design of Permafrost Beds for Global Warming
British Library Online Contents | 1997
|Limiting-state design of permafrost beds for global warming
Online Contents | 1997
|