Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Relative economy of prestressed and conventional reinforced concrete reservoirs
Cylindrical walls designed for various stress combinations are compared and most advantageous are selected for economy study; designs reveal that walls of prestressed concrete have lower first cost than conventional designs; underground reservoirs could compete with those above ground for capacities greater than 2.5 mg; prestressed construction saved from 40 to 60% of steel and up to 35% of concrete.
Relative economy of prestressed and conventional reinforced concrete reservoirs
Cylindrical walls designed for various stress combinations are compared and most advantageous are selected for economy study; designs reveal that walls of prestressed concrete have lower first cost than conventional designs; underground reservoirs could compete with those above ground for capacities greater than 2.5 mg; prestressed construction saved from 40 to 60% of steel and up to 35% of concrete.
Relative economy of prestressed and conventional reinforced concrete reservoirs
Am Concrete Inst -- J
Ernst, G.C. (Autor:in) / Brunken, C.O. (Autor:in) / Riveland, A.R. (Autor:in)
1952
7 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Englisch
© Metadata Copyright Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
Prestressed vs. conventional reinforced concrete reservoirs
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1954
Prestressed concrete reservoirs
Engineering Index Backfile | 1943
Prestressed concrete reservoirs
Engineering Index Backfile | 1941
Prestressed concrete reservoirs
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1953
Prestressed concrete reservoirs
| Engineering Index Backfile | 1950