Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Evaluation of ambient SO2 measurement methods at roadside sites
Abstract Accurate measurements of SO2 at low ambient concentrations are needed in order to investigate the role of SO2 in particle nucleation events and the long-term impact of reductions in sulfur emissions in recent decades. In this study, artifacts in SO2 concentration measurements were investigated using two identical ion chromatography-based instruments (the Gas Particle Ion Chromatograph, GP-IC, Dionex Corporation) and two identical UV fluorescence-based SO2 analyzers (the TECO 43CTL, an industry standard). The SO2 concentration values measured with the GP-IC at roadside sites were compared with simultaneous side-by-side measurements made with the fluorescence analyzers. The SO2 concentration measured with the GP-IC had an ∼30% negative calibration artifact. When the GP-ICs were calibrated using an improved procedure developed in the course of this study, only a ±5% difference from the TECO analyzers remained, except under high NO concentration conditions. The fluorescence analyzers exhibited a positive artifact under elevated NO concentration conditions. Sulfur oxidation ratios were calculated based on the GP-IC-measured SO2 and SO4 2- concentrations and used to help identify potential emission sources. The SO2 concentrations measured with the GP-IC were also compared to data obtained from a National Air Pollution Surveillance (NAPS) speciation sampler equipped with a Na2CO3-coated denuder. Good correlation between SO2 data from the two methods was seen during five months of measurement, but the GP-IC SO2 data were ∼30% lower than the NAPS data. Deposition of SO2 within an urban street canyon is discussed as a possible explanation for this difference.
Highlights ► The SO2 concentration measured with the GP-IC had a ∼30% negative calibration artifact. ► The GP-ICs were calibrated using an improved procedure developed in the course of this study. ► Only a ±5% difference from TECO analyzers remained, except under high NO concentration conditions. ► Sulfur oxidation ratios were calculated and used to help identify potential emission sources.
Evaluation of ambient SO2 measurement methods at roadside sites
Abstract Accurate measurements of SO2 at low ambient concentrations are needed in order to investigate the role of SO2 in particle nucleation events and the long-term impact of reductions in sulfur emissions in recent decades. In this study, artifacts in SO2 concentration measurements were investigated using two identical ion chromatography-based instruments (the Gas Particle Ion Chromatograph, GP-IC, Dionex Corporation) and two identical UV fluorescence-based SO2 analyzers (the TECO 43CTL, an industry standard). The SO2 concentration values measured with the GP-IC at roadside sites were compared with simultaneous side-by-side measurements made with the fluorescence analyzers. The SO2 concentration measured with the GP-IC had an ∼30% negative calibration artifact. When the GP-ICs were calibrated using an improved procedure developed in the course of this study, only a ±5% difference from the TECO analyzers remained, except under high NO concentration conditions. The fluorescence analyzers exhibited a positive artifact under elevated NO concentration conditions. Sulfur oxidation ratios were calculated based on the GP-IC-measured SO2 and SO4 2- concentrations and used to help identify potential emission sources. The SO2 concentrations measured with the GP-IC were also compared to data obtained from a National Air Pollution Surveillance (NAPS) speciation sampler equipped with a Na2CO3-coated denuder. Good correlation between SO2 data from the two methods was seen during five months of measurement, but the GP-IC SO2 data were ∼30% lower than the NAPS data. Deposition of SO2 within an urban street canyon is discussed as a possible explanation for this difference.
Highlights ► The SO2 concentration measured with the GP-IC had a ∼30% negative calibration artifact. ► The GP-ICs were calibrated using an improved procedure developed in the course of this study. ► Only a ±5% difference from TECO analyzers remained, except under high NO concentration conditions. ► Sulfur oxidation ratios were calculated and used to help identify potential emission sources.
Evaluation of ambient SO2 measurement methods at roadside sites
Yao, Xiaohong (Autor:in) / Lee, Colin J. (Autor:in) / Evans, Greg J. (Autor:in) / Chu, Amanda (Autor:in) / Godri, Krystal J. (Autor:in) / McGuire, Maygan L. (Autor:in) / Ng, Andy C. (Autor:in) / Whitelaw, Clarissa (Autor:in)
Atmospheric Environment ; 45 ; 2781-2788
28.01.2011
8 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
NOx , SO<inf>2</inf> , GP-IC , Roadside , Artifact
ROADSIDE MAINTENANCE - Roadside Maintenance Liability Issues
Online Contents | 2001
Engineering Index Backfile | 1933