Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Primary school closures and population development – is school vitality an investment in the attractiveness of the (rural) communities or not?
Abstract Over the last two decades, many municipalities in Finland have attempted to cut costs by closing small schools. In particular, rural schools with low enrolment have been the target of these savings. The main argument has been that out-migration and depopulation require adjustments to public infrastructure. This continuing tendency has raised many concerns about the effect of school closures on rural development, and remains a controversial issue in public debate. This paper examines the impacts of school closures on the population development of local communities using DID regression modelling combined with matching methods, focusing on the years 2010–2018. The results indicate that in Finland after school closure, the population of the surrounding community decreased more than before school closure. The increasing depopulation after a school closure means that school closures do not just raise questions about the individual school or the municipal school network, but more broadly about the vitality of the municipality and its development.
Highlights In Finland after school closure, the population of the surrounding community decreased more than before school closure. In rural communities the impacts of school closure have been slightly more negative suggesting a higher risk of self-reinforcing population decline. The negative impacts of school closures can be one incentive to look for new solutions and innovations to organize and develop school networks.
Primary school closures and population development – is school vitality an investment in the attractiveness of the (rural) communities or not?
Abstract Over the last two decades, many municipalities in Finland have attempted to cut costs by closing small schools. In particular, rural schools with low enrolment have been the target of these savings. The main argument has been that out-migration and depopulation require adjustments to public infrastructure. This continuing tendency has raised many concerns about the effect of school closures on rural development, and remains a controversial issue in public debate. This paper examines the impacts of school closures on the population development of local communities using DID regression modelling combined with matching methods, focusing on the years 2010–2018. The results indicate that in Finland after school closure, the population of the surrounding community decreased more than before school closure. The increasing depopulation after a school closure means that school closures do not just raise questions about the individual school or the municipal school network, but more broadly about the vitality of the municipality and its development.
Highlights In Finland after school closure, the population of the surrounding community decreased more than before school closure. In rural communities the impacts of school closure have been slightly more negative suggesting a higher risk of self-reinforcing population decline. The negative impacts of school closures can be one incentive to look for new solutions and innovations to organize and develop school networks.
Primary school closures and population development – is school vitality an investment in the attractiveness of the (rural) communities or not?
Lehtonen, Olli (Autor:in)
Journal of Rural Studies ; 82 ; 138-147
04.01.2021
10 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
School closure , Community , Population development , DiD , GIS , Finland
Do rural school closures lead to local population decline?
| Elsevier | 2021
The political effects of rural school closures – Evidence from Sweden
| Elsevier | 2023