Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Has farmer welfare improved after rural residential land circulation?
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3187-9041
Abstract The uneven distribution of welfare not only hinders social fairness but also affects the optimal allocation of resources for rural residential land. Recourse to traditional welfare theory or Amartya Sen's function and ability welfare theory is inappropriate in this situation as neither is focused on the influence of welfare differences. Therefore, this study aims to provide a new focus for welfare economics in integrating the concept of the internal group welfare gap into overall welfare evaluation. Fuzzy mathematics is applied to calculate welfare and the concept of the Gini coefficient is used to evaluate the welfare gap. The resulting model is applied to the cities of Guangzhou, Chongqing, and Wuxi before and after rural residential land circulation (RRLC) to determine their resulting changes in welfare and welfare gap. From this, it is found that, after RRLC, the farmers' overall welfare increased by 17.5%, 15.1%, and 23.5% respectively, while the welfare gap of Guangzhou and Wuxi was improved, and Chongqing was decreased. This means the welfare gap widened in Guangzhou and Wuxi, while narrowed in Chongqing. Concluding remarks call for increased government attention to the fair distribution of welfare between different groups of farmers by increased social security and a more detailed consideration of the groups involved.
Highlights After rural residential land circulation (RRLC), the farmers' overall welfare increased. After RRLC, the welfare gap of Guangzhou and Wuxi was improved, and Chongqing was decreased. China's dualistic land system and differences in urban and rural household residential registration. For differences in regional economic development, the patterns and policies of RRLC have been differentiated geographically.
Has farmer welfare improved after rural residential land circulation?
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3187-9041
Abstract The uneven distribution of welfare not only hinders social fairness but also affects the optimal allocation of resources for rural residential land. Recourse to traditional welfare theory or Amartya Sen's function and ability welfare theory is inappropriate in this situation as neither is focused on the influence of welfare differences. Therefore, this study aims to provide a new focus for welfare economics in integrating the concept of the internal group welfare gap into overall welfare evaluation. Fuzzy mathematics is applied to calculate welfare and the concept of the Gini coefficient is used to evaluate the welfare gap. The resulting model is applied to the cities of Guangzhou, Chongqing, and Wuxi before and after rural residential land circulation (RRLC) to determine their resulting changes in welfare and welfare gap. From this, it is found that, after RRLC, the farmers' overall welfare increased by 17.5%, 15.1%, and 23.5% respectively, while the welfare gap of Guangzhou and Wuxi was improved, and Chongqing was decreased. This means the welfare gap widened in Guangzhou and Wuxi, while narrowed in Chongqing. Concluding remarks call for increased government attention to the fair distribution of welfare between different groups of farmers by increased social security and a more detailed consideration of the groups involved.
Highlights After rural residential land circulation (RRLC), the farmers' overall welfare increased. After RRLC, the welfare gap of Guangzhou and Wuxi was improved, and Chongqing was decreased. China's dualistic land system and differences in urban and rural household residential registration. For differences in regional economic development, the patterns and policies of RRLC have been differentiated geographically.
Has farmer welfare improved after rural residential land circulation?
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3187-9041
Abstract The uneven distribution of welfare not only hinders social fairness but also affects the optimal allocation of resources for rural residential land. Recourse to traditional welfare theory or Amartya Sen's function and ability welfare theory is inappropriate in this situation as neither is focused on the influence of welfare differences. Therefore, this study aims to provide a new focus for welfare economics in integrating the concept of the internal group welfare gap into overall welfare evaluation. Fuzzy mathematics is applied to calculate welfare and the concept of the Gini coefficient is used to evaluate the welfare gap. The resulting model is applied to the cities of Guangzhou, Chongqing, and Wuxi before and after rural residential land circulation (RRLC) to determine their resulting changes in welfare and welfare gap. From this, it is found that, after RRLC, the farmers' overall welfare increased by 17.5%, 15.1%, and 23.5% respectively, while the welfare gap of Guangzhou and Wuxi was improved, and Chongqing was decreased. This means the welfare gap widened in Guangzhou and Wuxi, while narrowed in Chongqing. Concluding remarks call for increased government attention to the fair distribution of welfare between different groups of farmers by increased social security and a more detailed consideration of the groups involved.
Highlights After rural residential land circulation (RRLC), the farmers' overall welfare increased. After RRLC, the welfare gap of Guangzhou and Wuxi was improved, and Chongqing was decreased. China's dualistic land system and differences in urban and rural household residential registration. For differences in regional economic development, the patterns and policies of RRLC have been differentiated geographically.
Has farmer welfare improved after rural residential land circulation?
Li, Huan (Autor:in) / Zhang, Xiaoling (Autor:in) / Li, Heng (Autor:in)
Journal of Rural Studies ; 93 ; 479-486
13.10.2019
8 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Farmer-led innovations and rural household welfare: Evidence from Ghana
| Elsevier | 2017
Farmer-led innovations and rural household welfare: Evidence from Ghana
| Online Contents | 2017
Residential land structure affects residential welfare: Linear and non-linear effects
| Elsevier | 2024
The Effect of Residential Land Market Regulations on Urban Welfare
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2009
Strengthening Rural Economy Through Farmer Producer Companies
| Springer Verlag | 2021