Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Impact of airports on regional accessibility and social development
Highlights ► Resident opinions about their local airport vary by region. ► Opinions tend to reflect the size and scope of services at the airport. ► Opinions tend to reflect specific characteristics of the region. ► Local airports influence resident location and retention in remoter regions.
Abstract This study compares the impact that two airports in Norway have on regional accessibility and social development. One of the airports is a small-sized airport that serves a relatively remote region and has direct air services to other regions in Norway but not to the capital city of Oslo or to destinations abroad. The other is a medium-sized airport that serves a relatively accessible region and has direct air services to the capital city of Oslo and to a number of destinations in Norway and abroad. The study compares opinions of residents that live in the respective regions and is based on the findings of a postal survey that was completed by over 2000 residents. The Independent Samples t-test is used to investigate the significance of any differences in opinion. Significant differences were found to reflect the size and scope of services available at the airports and specific characteristics of the regions that they serve. Residents in the more remote region have a significantly higher frequency of travel by air to destinations in Norway but a significantly lower frequency of travel by air to destinations abroad. Trip frequency for holidays is significantly higher in the region that has an airport with direct international air services while trip frequency to access health services is significantly higher in the region that has limited local health services. The airport is significantly more important for resident location and retention in the remoter region.
Impact of airports on regional accessibility and social development
Highlights ► Resident opinions about their local airport vary by region. ► Opinions tend to reflect the size and scope of services at the airport. ► Opinions tend to reflect specific characteristics of the region. ► Local airports influence resident location and retention in remoter regions.
Abstract This study compares the impact that two airports in Norway have on regional accessibility and social development. One of the airports is a small-sized airport that serves a relatively remote region and has direct air services to other regions in Norway but not to the capital city of Oslo or to destinations abroad. The other is a medium-sized airport that serves a relatively accessible region and has direct air services to the capital city of Oslo and to a number of destinations in Norway and abroad. The study compares opinions of residents that live in the respective regions and is based on the findings of a postal survey that was completed by over 2000 residents. The Independent Samples t-test is used to investigate the significance of any differences in opinion. Significant differences were found to reflect the size and scope of services available at the airports and specific characteristics of the regions that they serve. Residents in the more remote region have a significantly higher frequency of travel by air to destinations in Norway but a significantly lower frequency of travel by air to destinations abroad. Trip frequency for holidays is significantly higher in the region that has an airport with direct international air services while trip frequency to access health services is significantly higher in the region that has limited local health services. The airport is significantly more important for resident location and retention in the remoter region.
Impact of airports on regional accessibility and social development
Halpern, Nigel (Autor:in) / Bråthen, Svein (Autor:in)
Journal of Transport Geography ; 19 ; 1145-1154
01.01.2010
10 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Impact of airports on regional accessibility and social development
Online Contents | 2011
|Engineering Index Backfile | 1929
|