Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Urban Air Mobility (UAM): Airport shuttles or city-taxis?
Abstract In the last years, Urban Air Mobility (UAM) has been receiving increasing attention and even if the first services are expected to be launched shortly, there is still uncertainty about which type of commercial services (e.g., airport shuttles or city-taxis) will be implemented at an early stage, as well as which price point will be perceived as affordable by travelers. Based on data collected through a large-scale survey campaign in the Milan metropolitan area (Italy), in this paper passengers' value of travel time savings for different UAM services are estimated using advanced discrete choice modeling. Estimated mixed logit models allowed to comparatively analyze the differences between the two potential use cases, i.e., airport shuttle and city-taxi services. Results show a willingness to pay for UAM services from/to airports that is greater (in a range of 44%–57%) than for travelling within the metropolitan area, and greater (in a range of 31%–44%) for business travels than for other purposes, indicating that the most financially sustainable UAM services will potentially be available for airport-shuttle connections from/to central business districts.
Highlights Willingness to pay for UAM airport shuttles (48–69 €/h) is greater than that for UAM city-taxis (34–44 €/h). Business travelers are willing to pay 31%–44% more than non-business ones for UAM services. In the early stages, UAM services connecting airports and central business districts will be the most financially sustainable.
Urban Air Mobility (UAM): Airport shuttles or city-taxis?
Abstract In the last years, Urban Air Mobility (UAM) has been receiving increasing attention and even if the first services are expected to be launched shortly, there is still uncertainty about which type of commercial services (e.g., airport shuttles or city-taxis) will be implemented at an early stage, as well as which price point will be perceived as affordable by travelers. Based on data collected through a large-scale survey campaign in the Milan metropolitan area (Italy), in this paper passengers' value of travel time savings for different UAM services are estimated using advanced discrete choice modeling. Estimated mixed logit models allowed to comparatively analyze the differences between the two potential use cases, i.e., airport shuttle and city-taxi services. Results show a willingness to pay for UAM services from/to airports that is greater (in a range of 44%–57%) than for travelling within the metropolitan area, and greater (in a range of 31%–44%) for business travels than for other purposes, indicating that the most financially sustainable UAM services will potentially be available for airport-shuttle connections from/to central business districts.
Highlights Willingness to pay for UAM airport shuttles (48–69 €/h) is greater than that for UAM city-taxis (34–44 €/h). Business travelers are willing to pay 31%–44% more than non-business ones for UAM services. In the early stages, UAM services connecting airports and central business districts will be the most financially sustainable.
Urban Air Mobility (UAM): Airport shuttles or city-taxis?
Coppola, Pierluigi (Autor:in) / De Fabiis, Francesco (Autor:in) / Silvestri, Fulvio (Autor:in)
Transport Policy ; 150 ; 24-34
04.03.2024
11 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
DOAJ | 2022
|Mobility Niches: Jitneys to Robo-Taxis
Online Contents | 2017
|Mobility Niches: Jitneys to Robo-Taxis
Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2017
|