Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
When it goes wrong … learning from challenged (and revived) community initiatives
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4751-4028
Abstract Both in academia and practice there is an increasing interest for community initiatives. Examples of best practices are often discussed and reproduced. However, there is little attention for the failure of such initiatives. Failed, or seriously challenged initiatives now remain invisible, as the initiators fear stigmatisation and the outcomes do not sell the potential of community initiatives policy-makers and academics envision. From earlier empirical research, after the development of community initiatives in depopulating regions, a significant number of bottom-up projects was identified that experienced serious problems and, in some cases, failed. The aim of this paper is to deconstruct context, causes and consequences for challenged initiatives. In this paper four challenged initiatives from Sweden and The Netherlands are discussed. It appeared that, in dealing with financial, bureaucratic, democratic and organisational challenges, most communities recovered gradually. By acknowledging the existence of failure, we can learn from their resilience and social learning. In conclusion several recommendations for practice are discussed, to provide institutional space for challenged community initiatives.
Highlights In contrast to best practices, there has been little attention for failure of community initaitives. This paper discusses four cases from Sweden and The Netherlands that were severely challenged (and revived). By acknowledging the existence of failure, we can learn from community resilience and social learning. We need more institutional space for failure: early on professional supportprevents serious errors.
When it goes wrong … learning from challenged (and revived) community initiatives
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4751-4028
Abstract Both in academia and practice there is an increasing interest for community initiatives. Examples of best practices are often discussed and reproduced. However, there is little attention for the failure of such initiatives. Failed, or seriously challenged initiatives now remain invisible, as the initiators fear stigmatisation and the outcomes do not sell the potential of community initiatives policy-makers and academics envision. From earlier empirical research, after the development of community initiatives in depopulating regions, a significant number of bottom-up projects was identified that experienced serious problems and, in some cases, failed. The aim of this paper is to deconstruct context, causes and consequences for challenged initiatives. In this paper four challenged initiatives from Sweden and The Netherlands are discussed. It appeared that, in dealing with financial, bureaucratic, democratic and organisational challenges, most communities recovered gradually. By acknowledging the existence of failure, we can learn from their resilience and social learning. In conclusion several recommendations for practice are discussed, to provide institutional space for challenged community initiatives.
Highlights In contrast to best practices, there has been little attention for failure of community initaitives. This paper discusses four cases from Sweden and The Netherlands that were severely challenged (and revived). By acknowledging the existence of failure, we can learn from community resilience and social learning. We need more institutional space for failure: early on professional supportprevents serious errors.
When it goes wrong … learning from challenged (and revived) community initiatives
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4751-4028
Abstract Both in academia and practice there is an increasing interest for community initiatives. Examples of best practices are often discussed and reproduced. However, there is little attention for the failure of such initiatives. Failed, or seriously challenged initiatives now remain invisible, as the initiators fear stigmatisation and the outcomes do not sell the potential of community initiatives policy-makers and academics envision. From earlier empirical research, after the development of community initiatives in depopulating regions, a significant number of bottom-up projects was identified that experienced serious problems and, in some cases, failed. The aim of this paper is to deconstruct context, causes and consequences for challenged initiatives. In this paper four challenged initiatives from Sweden and The Netherlands are discussed. It appeared that, in dealing with financial, bureaucratic, democratic and organisational challenges, most communities recovered gradually. By acknowledging the existence of failure, we can learn from their resilience and social learning. In conclusion several recommendations for practice are discussed, to provide institutional space for challenged community initiatives.
Highlights In contrast to best practices, there has been little attention for failure of community initaitives. This paper discusses four cases from Sweden and The Netherlands that were severely challenged (and revived). By acknowledging the existence of failure, we can learn from community resilience and social learning. We need more institutional space for failure: early on professional supportprevents serious errors.
When it goes wrong … learning from challenged (and revived) community initiatives
Meijer, Marlies (Autor:in)
Journal of Rural Studies ; 74 ; 1-9
03.11.2019
9 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
When Integration Goes Wrong: Learning from the Mistakes of Practitioners
| British Library Online Contents | 2016
When Integration Goes Wrong: Learning from the Mistakes of Practitioners
| Online Contents | 2016
When Integration Goes Wrong: Learning from the Mistakes of Practitioners
| Online Contents | 2016
Foundations - What happens when it goes wrong?
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2008