Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Reply to discussion of “Tropospheric ozone variability over the Iberian Peninsula Atmospheric Environment” by
Abstract In the discussion paper on our article (), de Laat has criticized TOR methodology and TOR data and thus questioned the validity of the findings. He has also pointed out the fact that the authors may have used the OMI/MLS data. In this reply to the discussion, the clarifications and references given herewith endeavour to undoubtedly answer the questions posed by de Laat on TOR methodology and on TOR data and thus proving that the findings of are scientifically justified and therefore entirely valid. Furthermore, reasons were presented to justify the non use of the OMI/MLS data.
Reply to discussion of “Tropospheric ozone variability over the Iberian Peninsula Atmospheric Environment” by
Abstract In the discussion paper on our article (), de Laat has criticized TOR methodology and TOR data and thus questioned the validity of the findings. He has also pointed out the fact that the authors may have used the OMI/MLS data. In this reply to the discussion, the clarifications and references given herewith endeavour to undoubtedly answer the questions posed by de Laat on TOR methodology and on TOR data and thus proving that the findings of are scientifically justified and therefore entirely valid. Furthermore, reasons were presented to justify the non use of the OMI/MLS data.
Reply to discussion of “Tropospheric ozone variability over the Iberian Peninsula Atmospheric Environment” by
Kulkarni, Pavan S. (Autor:in) / Bortoli, D. (Autor:in) / Salgado, R. (Autor:in) / Antón, M. (Autor:in) / Costa, M.J. (Autor:in) / Silva, A.M. (Autor:in)
Atmospheric Environment ; 45 ; 2600-2602
16.02.2011
3 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Tropospheric ozone variability over the Iberian Peninsula
Elsevier | 2010
|Taylor & Francis Verlag | 1975