Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Evaluation of staff's perception of a circadian lighting system implemented in a hospital
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-5718
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9071-7168
Abstract Natural and electrical lighting have received attention in hospital environments due to their ability to increase hospital staffs' performance, improve shift workers' circadian rhythm and improve patients' recovery. Researchers have investigated health care staffs' satisfaction with their lit work environment in real-life settings; however, staff members' perception of a circadian lighting system (CLS) that operates automatically has yet to be researched. This paper presents the implementation of a CLS installed in a newly built hospital between June 2021–February 2022. Two surveys (n1 = 63, n2 = 48) and 10 interviews were conducted with staff. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was conducted to compare staff members’ responses between the pre-existing lighting (PeL) and circadian lighting system (CLS) at Neuro Intensive Care Unit and Postanesthesia Care Unit. The results showed a statistically significant satisfaction with the CLS compared with the PeL (p = 0.0003), and the staff found the CLS easier to use (p = 0.0011) and to adjust (p = 0.0023). The staff working in rooms with multiple patients appreciated the ability to adjust the lighting to the individual patient. These results supplement the existing body of research by presenting a field-study that illuminates barriers and advantages to consider when implementing CLS in hospitals. We conclude that CLS can complement a complex work environment in hospitals, but it requires close collaboration with occupants and continuous adjustments to the lighting settings for a successful implementation, and long-term use of the lighting system.
Highlights Presents staff's perception of an automated 24hr lighting profile in a hospital. Circadian lighting is reported as satisfactory for work. Brightness levels should be considered. Interview as a supplementary method revealed nuances of the staffs' satisfaction. Collaboration with occupants is advised to tailor the lighting to the context.
Evaluation of staff's perception of a circadian lighting system implemented in a hospital
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-5718
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9071-7168
Abstract Natural and electrical lighting have received attention in hospital environments due to their ability to increase hospital staffs' performance, improve shift workers' circadian rhythm and improve patients' recovery. Researchers have investigated health care staffs' satisfaction with their lit work environment in real-life settings; however, staff members' perception of a circadian lighting system (CLS) that operates automatically has yet to be researched. This paper presents the implementation of a CLS installed in a newly built hospital between June 2021–February 2022. Two surveys (n1 = 63, n2 = 48) and 10 interviews were conducted with staff. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was conducted to compare staff members’ responses between the pre-existing lighting (PeL) and circadian lighting system (CLS) at Neuro Intensive Care Unit and Postanesthesia Care Unit. The results showed a statistically significant satisfaction with the CLS compared with the PeL (p = 0.0003), and the staff found the CLS easier to use (p = 0.0011) and to adjust (p = 0.0023). The staff working in rooms with multiple patients appreciated the ability to adjust the lighting to the individual patient. These results supplement the existing body of research by presenting a field-study that illuminates barriers and advantages to consider when implementing CLS in hospitals. We conclude that CLS can complement a complex work environment in hospitals, but it requires close collaboration with occupants and continuous adjustments to the lighting settings for a successful implementation, and long-term use of the lighting system.
Highlights Presents staff's perception of an automated 24hr lighting profile in a hospital. Circadian lighting is reported as satisfactory for work. Brightness levels should be considered. Interview as a supplementary method revealed nuances of the staffs' satisfaction. Collaboration with occupants is advised to tailor the lighting to the context.
Evaluation of staff's perception of a circadian lighting system implemented in a hospital
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-5718
https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9071-7168
Abstract Natural and electrical lighting have received attention in hospital environments due to their ability to increase hospital staffs' performance, improve shift workers' circadian rhythm and improve patients' recovery. Researchers have investigated health care staffs' satisfaction with their lit work environment in real-life settings; however, staff members' perception of a circadian lighting system (CLS) that operates automatically has yet to be researched. This paper presents the implementation of a CLS installed in a newly built hospital between June 2021–February 2022. Two surveys (n1 = 63, n2 = 48) and 10 interviews were conducted with staff. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was conducted to compare staff members’ responses between the pre-existing lighting (PeL) and circadian lighting system (CLS) at Neuro Intensive Care Unit and Postanesthesia Care Unit. The results showed a statistically significant satisfaction with the CLS compared with the PeL (p = 0.0003), and the staff found the CLS easier to use (p = 0.0011) and to adjust (p = 0.0023). The staff working in rooms with multiple patients appreciated the ability to adjust the lighting to the individual patient. These results supplement the existing body of research by presenting a field-study that illuminates barriers and advantages to consider when implementing CLS in hospitals. We conclude that CLS can complement a complex work environment in hospitals, but it requires close collaboration with occupants and continuous adjustments to the lighting settings for a successful implementation, and long-term use of the lighting system.
Highlights Presents staff's perception of an automated 24hr lighting profile in a hospital. Circadian lighting is reported as satisfactory for work. Brightness levels should be considered. Interview as a supplementary method revealed nuances of the staffs' satisfaction. Collaboration with occupants is advised to tailor the lighting to the context.
Evaluation of staff's perception of a circadian lighting system implemented in a hospital
Schledermann, K.M. (Autor:in) / Bjørner, T. (Autor:in) / West, A.S. (Autor:in) / Hansen, T.S. (Autor:in)
Building and Environment ; 242
31.05.2023
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
| BASE | 2021
The impact of light adjustment versus tuneable white mode on ICU staff’s circadian rhythms
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2025
Hospital employees’ perceptions of circadian lighting: a pharmacy department case study
| Emerald Group Publishing | 2019
Control in healthcare interiors: the staff’s perspective
| Taylor & Francis Verlag | 2023
A Study on Designing No-Penalty Reporting System about Enterprise Staff's near Miss
| British Library Conference Proceedings | 2011