Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
A comparative study of compression behaviors of cross-laminated timber and glued-laminated timber columns
Highlights GLT column specimens had a greater compressive loading capacity than CLT column specimens. CLT column specimens had better ductility and energy absorption than GLT column specimens owing to the cross-lamination. The stress-strain relationship of CLT and GLT columns had three stages and can be modeled. Failure modes of GLT column specimens were simple but they were relatively complicated for CLT column specimens.
Abstract This work investigated the different axial compression behaviors of cross-laminated timber columns (CLTCs) and control glued-laminated timber columns (GLTCs). The average compression modulus of elasticity (MOE) and strength values of the CLTCs were lower than those of the control GLTCs and appeared to be dependent on the area ratio in the axial direction. The column length had different effects on the compression behaviors of CLTCs and GLTCs, and compared with the GLTCs, the CLTCs exhibited enhanced ductility and energy absorption properties due to the cross-lamination. Of the three models developed in this work, model I is recommended for GLTCs and model II for CLTCs.
A comparative study of compression behaviors of cross-laminated timber and glued-laminated timber columns
Highlights GLT column specimens had a greater compressive loading capacity than CLT column specimens. CLT column specimens had better ductility and energy absorption than GLT column specimens owing to the cross-lamination. The stress-strain relationship of CLT and GLT columns had three stages and can be modeled. Failure modes of GLT column specimens were simple but they were relatively complicated for CLT column specimens.
Abstract This work investigated the different axial compression behaviors of cross-laminated timber columns (CLTCs) and control glued-laminated timber columns (GLTCs). The average compression modulus of elasticity (MOE) and strength values of the CLTCs were lower than those of the control GLTCs and appeared to be dependent on the area ratio in the axial direction. The column length had different effects on the compression behaviors of CLTCs and GLTCs, and compared with the GLTCs, the CLTCs exhibited enhanced ductility and energy absorption properties due to the cross-lamination. Of the three models developed in this work, model I is recommended for GLTCs and model II for CLTCs.
A comparative study of compression behaviors of cross-laminated timber and glued-laminated timber columns
Wei, Peixing (Autor:in) / Wang, Brad Jianhe (Autor:in) / Li, Hao (Autor:in) / Wang, Libin (Autor:in) / Peng, Si (Autor:in) / Zhang, Long (Autor:in)
Construction and Building Materials ; 222 ; 86-95
17.06.2019
10 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Compression Resistance of Glued Laminated Timber Short Columns
British Library Conference Proceedings | 1995
|Engineering Index Backfile | 1964
|Design of Glued Laminated Timber Columns
Online Contents | 1995
|Design of Glued Laminated Timber Columns
British Library Online Contents | 1995
|METHOD TO MANUFACTURE CONSTRUCTION GLUED LAMINATED TIMBER AND CONSTRUCTION GLUED LAMINATED TIMBER
Europäisches Patentamt | 2015
|