Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
A field experiment on the impact of sounds from a jet-and-basin fountain on soundscape quality in an urban park
Highlights Water sounds and ratings of soundscape quality were not directly related. Using water sounds to mask road-traffic noise is not simple and straight forward. Water sounds may affect the audibility of wanted as well as unwanted sounds. Water features ought to be pre-tested before constructed.
Abstract A field experiment was conducted to explore whether water sounds from a fountain had a positive impact on soundscape quality in a downtown park. In total, 405 visitors were recruited to answer a questionnaire on how they perceived the park, including its acoustic environment. Meanwhile the fountain was turned on or off, at irregular hours. Water sounds from the fountain were not directly associated with ratings of soundscape quality. Rather, the predictors of soundscape quality were the variables “Road-traffic noise” and “Other natural sounds”. The former had a negative and the latter a positive impact. However, water sounds may have had an indirect impact on soundscape quality by affecting the audibility of road-traffic and natural sounds. The present results, obtained in situ, agree with previous results in soundscape research that the sounds perceived—particularly roadtraffic and natural sounds—explain soundscape quality. They also agree with the results from laboratory studies that water sounds may mask road-traffic sounds, but that this is not simple and straight forward. Thus sound should be brought into the design scheme when introducing water features in urban open spaces, and their environmental impact must be thoroughly assessed empirically.
A field experiment on the impact of sounds from a jet-and-basin fountain on soundscape quality in an urban park
Highlights Water sounds and ratings of soundscape quality were not directly related. Using water sounds to mask road-traffic noise is not simple and straight forward. Water sounds may affect the audibility of wanted as well as unwanted sounds. Water features ought to be pre-tested before constructed.
Abstract A field experiment was conducted to explore whether water sounds from a fountain had a positive impact on soundscape quality in a downtown park. In total, 405 visitors were recruited to answer a questionnaire on how they perceived the park, including its acoustic environment. Meanwhile the fountain was turned on or off, at irregular hours. Water sounds from the fountain were not directly associated with ratings of soundscape quality. Rather, the predictors of soundscape quality were the variables “Road-traffic noise” and “Other natural sounds”. The former had a negative and the latter a positive impact. However, water sounds may have had an indirect impact on soundscape quality by affecting the audibility of road-traffic and natural sounds. The present results, obtained in situ, agree with previous results in soundscape research that the sounds perceived—particularly roadtraffic and natural sounds—explain soundscape quality. They also agree with the results from laboratory studies that water sounds may mask road-traffic sounds, but that this is not simple and straight forward. Thus sound should be brought into the design scheme when introducing water features in urban open spaces, and their environmental impact must be thoroughly assessed empirically.
A field experiment on the impact of sounds from a jet-and-basin fountain on soundscape quality in an urban park
Axelsson, Östen (Autor:in) / Nilsson, Mats E. (Autor:in) / Hellström, Björn (Autor:in) / Lundén, Peter (Autor:in)
Landscape and Urban Planning ; 123 ; 49-60
04.12.2013
12 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
An Interactive Soundscape Tool for Urban Park Design
Springer Verlag | 2024
|LOUDNESS OF FOUNTAIN AND ROAD TRAFFIC SOUNDS IN A CITY PARK
British Library Conference Proceedings | 2009
|BASE | 2016
|