Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Supervised vs. unsupervised learning for construction crew productivity prediction
Abstract Complex variability is a significant problem in predicting construction crew productivity. Neural Networks using supervised learning methods like Feed Forward Back Propagation (FFBP) and General Regression Neural Networks (GRNN) have proved to be more advantageous than statistical methods like multiple regression, considering factors like the modelling ease and the prediction accuracy. Neural Networks using unsupervised learning like Self Organizing Maps (SOM) have additionally been introduced as methods that overcome some of the weaknesses of supervised learning methods through their clustering ability. The objective of this article is thus to compare the performances of FFBP, GRNN and SOM in predicting construction crew productivity. Related data has been collected from 117 plastering crews through a systematized time study and comparison of prediction performances of the three methods showed that SOM have a superior performance in predicting plastering crew productivity.
Highlights ► We compare prediction of supervised and unsupervised learning methods for crew productivity. ► We use FFBP, GRNN and SOM. ► SOM have a superior performance in predicting plastering crew productivity.
Supervised vs. unsupervised learning for construction crew productivity prediction
Abstract Complex variability is a significant problem in predicting construction crew productivity. Neural Networks using supervised learning methods like Feed Forward Back Propagation (FFBP) and General Regression Neural Networks (GRNN) have proved to be more advantageous than statistical methods like multiple regression, considering factors like the modelling ease and the prediction accuracy. Neural Networks using unsupervised learning like Self Organizing Maps (SOM) have additionally been introduced as methods that overcome some of the weaknesses of supervised learning methods through their clustering ability. The objective of this article is thus to compare the performances of FFBP, GRNN and SOM in predicting construction crew productivity. Related data has been collected from 117 plastering crews through a systematized time study and comparison of prediction performances of the three methods showed that SOM have a superior performance in predicting plastering crew productivity.
Highlights ► We compare prediction of supervised and unsupervised learning methods for crew productivity. ► We use FFBP, GRNN and SOM. ► SOM have a superior performance in predicting plastering crew productivity.
Supervised vs. unsupervised learning for construction crew productivity prediction
Oral, Mustafa (Autor:in) / Oral, Emel Laptali (Autor:in) / Aydın, Ahmet (Autor:in)
Automation in Construction ; 22 ; 271-276
16.09.2011
6 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Supervised vs. unsupervised learning for construction crew productivity prediction
| Online Contents | 2012
Supervised vs. unsupervised learning for construction crew productivity prediction
| British Library Online Contents | 2012