Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Eine Plattform für die Wissenschaft: Bauingenieurwesen, Architektur und Urbanistik
Deposition of sulphur and the acidity of precipitation over ireland
Abstract Routine monthly measurements of airborne and precipitated sulphur over Ireland have been analysed, to determine the annual wet and dry deposition of sulphur, and compared with the predictions of a statistical long-range transport model. Comparisons between Ireland and south west Norway have been made, since in several ways the two regions are similar, being remote from major industrial sources in Europe. The difference in the sulphur concentration in rain is too small to account for the difference in the average acidity of rain in the two countries, and the importance of basic ions from non-industrial sources is noted. Rain over Ireland is only slightly acid and no trends in the acidity of rain have been found in data going back 15 years. It is not possible to estimate the effect on acidity of a reduction in sulphate. Comparisons are made between the measurements and calculations which indicate that only about 50 % of the measured deposition over Ireland can be explained by direct long-range transport from man-made sources. Of this 50 %, 65 % comes from sources in Great Britain. Errors in modelling are not sufficient to explain this difference and it is suggested that, in addition, in the Irish sampling network there may be sizeable local, natural and background contributions. A study of the correlation between measurements at adjacent sampling stations is consistent with the view that about 50% of the airborne sulphur over Ireland may come from distant sources.
Deposition of sulphur and the acidity of precipitation over ireland
Abstract Routine monthly measurements of airborne and precipitated sulphur over Ireland have been analysed, to determine the annual wet and dry deposition of sulphur, and compared with the predictions of a statistical long-range transport model. Comparisons between Ireland and south west Norway have been made, since in several ways the two regions are similar, being remote from major industrial sources in Europe. The difference in the sulphur concentration in rain is too small to account for the difference in the average acidity of rain in the two countries, and the importance of basic ions from non-industrial sources is noted. Rain over Ireland is only slightly acid and no trends in the acidity of rain have been found in data going back 15 years. It is not possible to estimate the effect on acidity of a reduction in sulphate. Comparisons are made between the measurements and calculations which indicate that only about 50 % of the measured deposition over Ireland can be explained by direct long-range transport from man-made sources. Of this 50 %, 65 % comes from sources in Great Britain. Errors in modelling are not sufficient to explain this difference and it is suggested that, in addition, in the Irish sampling network there may be sizeable local, natural and background contributions. A study of the correlation between measurements at adjacent sampling stations is consistent with the view that about 50% of the airborne sulphur over Ireland may come from distant sources.
Deposition of sulphur and the acidity of precipitation over ireland
Fisher, B.E.A. (Autor:in)
Atmospheric Environment ; 16 ; 2725-2734
08.02.1982
10 pages
Aufsatz (Zeitschrift)
Elektronische Ressource
Englisch
Canopy interaction with precipitation and sulphur deposition in two boreal forests of Quebec, Canada
| Online Contents | 2012
The influence of dust events on precipitation acidity in China
| Elsevier | 2013
Acidity, sulphur coverage and XPS analyses of ZrO"2-SO"4 powders by different procedures
| British Library Online Contents | 1999